My business is Franchises. Ratings. Success stories. Ideas. Work and education
About the site Contacts
Menu
Contacts
Site search

home Interpreter Protocol of the commission for compliance with the teacher's position. Minutes of the meeting of the attestation commission

Protocol of the commission for compliance with the teacher's position. Minutes of the meeting of the attestation commission

PROTOCOL

from26 . november 2013 № _ 1 _

Present:

Chairman

Vice-chairman Vera Viktorovna Dmitrieva

Secretary Natalya Borisovna Mironova:

Commission members:

AGENDA

About ComplianceSizova Yulia Sergeevna, teacher - psychologist ,

(full name, position)

educator

LISTENED:

who introduced

(Full name of the secretary)

Sizova Yulia Sergeevna,

educator

(full name, position)

Sozovoi Yu.S. sufficient practical

(Full name of the certified person)

DECIDED:

Recognize_______________Sizova Yulia Sergeevna ______________,

(Full name of the certified person)

educator _________________;

(indicate the position of the employee)

(signature) (full name)

(signature) (full name)

(signature) (full name)

(signature) (full name)

____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

(signature) (full name)

PROTOCOL

meetings attestation commission in order to confirm

compliance with the position teaching staff

municipal budgetary educational institution

municipality city of Krasnodar secondary

secondary school № 22

from13th of January 2014 № _ 2 _

Present:

Chairman Irina Nikolaevna Kukushkina Deputy Director for UMR.

Vice-chairman Vera Viktorovna Dmitrieva Deputy Director for UVR.

Secretary Natalya Borisovna Mironova: teacher of Russian language and higher literature qualification category.

Commission members:

M.V. Shevchenko: chairman of the primary trade union organization of MBOU secondary school No. 22

A.V. Pochekkova: teacher of mathematics of the first qualification category.

M.A. Tabakov: teacher primary school first qualification category

AGENDA

About ComplianceAvdysheva Valentina Yuvelievna, primary school teacher ,

(full name, position)

qualification requirements by positioneducator

LISTENED:

Mironova Natalya Borisovna Secretary who introduced

(Full name of the secretary)

members of the attestation commission with a presentation onAvdysheva Valentina Yuvelievna,

educator

(full name, position)

Based on teaching experienceAvdysheva V. Yu. sufficient practical

(Full name of the certified person)

experience and competence, quality and full implementation official duties

DECIDED:

Recognize_______________Avdysheva Valentina Yuvelievna ______________,

(Full name of the certified person)

Corresponds to _______________educator _________________;

(indicate the position of the employee)

subject to passing professional retraining or advanced training;

Does not correspond to the position __________________________.

(indicate the position of the employee)

Chairman ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Vice-chairman____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Secretary ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Commission members: ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Acquainted with the protocol: ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

PROTOCOL

meetings of the attestation commission in order to confirm

compliance with the position of teaching staff

municipal budgetary educational institution

municipality city of Krasnodar secondary

secondary school No. 22

from12th of February 2014 № _ 3 _

Present:

Chairman Irina Nikolaevna Kukushkina Deputy Director for UMR.

Vice-chairman Vera Viktorovna Dmitrieva Deputy Director for UVR.

Secretary Natalya Borisovna Mironova: teacher of Russian language and literature of the highest qualification category.

Commission members:

M.V. Shevchenko: chairman of the primary trade union organization of MBOU secondary school No. 22

A.V. Pochekkova: teacher of mathematics of the first qualification category.

M.A. Tabakova: primary school teacher of the first qualification category

AGENDA

About ComplianceProsvetova Svetlana Valentinovna, primary school teacher ,

(full name, position)

qualification requirements for the positioneducator

LISTENED:

Mironova Natalya Borisovna Secretary who introduced

(Full name of the secretary)

members of the attestation commission with a presentation onProsvetova Svetlana Valentinovna,

educator

(full name, position)

Based on teaching experienceProsvetovoy S.V. sufficient practical

(Full name of the certified person)

experience and competence, high-quality and full performance of official duties

DECIDED:

Recognize_______________Prosvetova Svetlana Valentinovna ______________,

(Full name of the certified person)

Corresponds to _______________educator _________________;

(indicate the position of the employee)

subject to professional retraining or advanced training;

Does not correspond to the position __________________________.

(indicate the position of the employee)

Chairman ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Vice-chairman____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Secretary ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Commission members: ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Acquainted with the protocol: ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

PROTOCOL

meetings of the attestation commission in order to confirm

compliance with the position of teaching staff

municipal budgetary educational institution

municipality city of Krasnodar secondary

secondary school No. 22

fromMarch 14th 2014 № _ 4 _

Present:

Chairman Irina Nikolaevna Kukushkina Deputy Director for UMR.

Vice-chairman Vera Viktorovna Dmitrieva Deputy Director for UVR.

Secretary Natalya Borisovna Mironova: teacher of Russian language and literature of the highest qualification category.

Commission members:

M.V. Shevchenko: chairman of the primary trade union organization of MBOU secondary school No. 22

A.V. Pochekkova: teacher of mathematics of the first qualification category.

M.A. Tabakova: primary school teacher of the first qualification category

AGENDA

About ComplianceChernova Elena Ivanovna, primary school teacher ,

(full name, position)

qualification requirements for the positioneducator

LISTENED:

Mironova Natalya Borisovna Secretary who introduced

(Full name of the secretary)

members of the attestation commission with a presentation onChernova Elena Ivanovna,

educator

(full name, position)

Based on teaching experienceChernova E.I. sufficient practical

(Full name of the certified person)

experience and competence, high-quality and full performance of official duties

DECIDED:

Recognize_______________Chernova Elena Ivanovna ______________,

(Full name of the certified person)

Corresponds to _______________educator _________________;

(indicate the position of the employee)

subject to professional retraining or advanced training;

Does not correspond to the position __________________________.

(indicate the position of the employee)

Chairman ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Vice-chairman____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Secretary ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Commission members: ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

Acquainted with the protocol: ____________ ___________

(signature) (full name)

The process of attestation for compliance with the position occupied can be called a multi-level combination, which is fixed not only in a number of local acts, but also fixed in the final document, namely the protocol.

Dear readers! The article talks about typical ways to solve legal issues, but each case is individual. If you want to know how solve exactly your problem- contact a consultant:

APPLICATIONS AND CALLS ARE ACCEPTED 24/7 and 7 days a week.

It's fast and FOR FREE!

And since the results of the assessment have a direct impact on many aspects of the employee's work - from an increase in wages to prospects career development- the specified document must be correctly drawn up. Subsequently, it may be needed during the court session.

Functions performed

The protocol of the attestation commission for compliance with the position held acts as the final document. It reflects not only the conclusion itself, but also the process of conducting the assessment, from the members of the commission and other persons present to the questions asked and the decision taken.

On the basis of previous actions, as well as a number of studied documents, a decision will be made by the direct head of the company on the future fate of the employee.

According to the results of the assessment, he can either acquire a number of preferences or lose his job.

Also, this document will be important later, if the result is disputed by the employee himself.

So, it is in court or in case of a complaint to other regulatory authorities that the protocol will be the main evidence of the correct conduct of the attestation procedure.

And you will need a protocol during the assessment next time, for example, in three or five years, since the members of the commission without fail take into account the process of execution by the employee of their previous decision.

Who is cooking?

Even at the stage of creation of the attestation commission, its composition must include a secretary, whose main function is documenting the entire procedure - from the preparation of forms to their completion, not to mention the notification or collection of signatures. The specified member of the commission is also responsible for keeping the protocol, carefully recording all the moments of the employee's assessment in accordance with the existing form of the protocol form.

How to draw up a protocol of the attestation commission for compliance with the position held?

In case of any disputable issues on the decision taken, all local acts regulating the certification process are important. But it is the protocol that will serve as the basis for subsequent sanctions against the assessed employee. There are special requirements for the document.

General requirements and registration rules

One of the main difficulties during the certification of employees is the lack of legislative regulation of the procedure itself, as well as the forms that must be drawn up in the process.

For this reason, the survey must necessarily be fixed in local acts, namely, in the same Regulations and in the order approving all the forms - from the attestation sheet to the protocol.

The regulation should also include the rules for filling out the protocol, as well as the procedure for the formation of subsequently entered information: the process of voting reflection, and general data, and other Additional information about the questions asked, not to mention the final decision and the presence of signatures of all persons involved in the evaluation process.

Structure and content

For most companies, periodic certification is not a mandatory procedure, therefore, there are no special requirements for a correct assessment and preparation of a protocol.

However, if the institution does use this form of personnel assessment, the protocol should include a number of mandatory information and also have a certain structure.

The document should be generated in the following order:

  • Title of the document, namely the minutes of the meeting;
  • Name of the organization;
  • date and place of creation of the act;
  • full data of the entire certification commission of those present (this important point to determine the quorum subsequently);
  • information about persons who are invited as experts, if the specifics of the assessment of the employee's performance require the opinion of a specialist from an identical field;
  • details of the employee being assessed, from full name, to position and structural unit;
  • agenda - certification for compliance with the position held;
  • submitted documents, namely an official review, a description and a brief meaning of the information reflected in these documents;
  • commission issues to the certified employee and the answers provided;
  • speech by the immediate supervisor of the assessed employee if he is invited and wishes to express his opinion in support of the employee or in confirmation of the violations committed;
  • assessment of the employee's performance, that is, a generalized result of his merits or misses;
  • recommendations, which can be expressed in the same direction for retraining or an increase in the allowance in case of a positive result;
  • vote in the context of "for", "against", "abstained";
  • conclusion - whether the worker corresponds to his position or not, and perhaps his compliance is partial without the same advanced training;
  • signatures of all members of the commission;
  • the signature of the assessed employee indicating the date of familiarization with the agreed document.

It should be noted that the rules for the form of record keeping are also not approved. This document can be filled out by hand, that is, by filling out an existing form, or in in electronic format with obligatory affixing of living signatures.

Also, this document can be certified with the seal of the institution, but not the main one, but the auxiliary one.

By the way, it is not necessary to draw up a separate protocol for each employee, especially if we are talking about a small state. However, if the evaluation process will take several days, the protocol must be started daily, indicating information about the employees being evaluated and the decision made in stages, indicating also the time of the certification.

Who is signing?

At the bottom of the protocol, the secretary is obliged to list all members of the commission who were present at the meeting, and also took part in the decision, including his own person.

At the same time, the list of surnames is not formed in a chaotic manner, but in compliance with the hierarchical affiliation, that is, the chairman is indicated first, then the secretary, and then the members of the commission.

Naturally, a place should be allotted for affixing a list and a certified employee who familiarizes himself with this document within the time limits established by the Regulations.

Number of copies

There is an opinion that the attestation protocol for compliance with the position held should be formed in several copies. They will be stored directly in the certification file, as well as in the employee's personal file and with the members of the commission.

However, this view is not correct:

  • The personal card already contains a separate paragraph on certification, which indicates the date of the procedure, the protocol number, as well as the results. There is no need to reflect other information, how to actually include applications.
  • Also, additional copies are not required for members of the commission, who are vested with certain powers only for the duration of the meeting.

Thus, the protocol is drawn up only in a single copy and is usually stored in the personnel department with all the documents on the assessment.

At the same time, if information about the results obtained is needed by the same employee or the court, the secretary of the commission is authorized to draw up an extract from the specified document.

Sample (example)

Document example:

The protocol form can be downloaded from our website:

Do you need to introduce employees?

All documents that directly affect labor activity a full-time employee, the company is obliged to present him for familiarization.

And since, according to the results of the assessment, the employee may lose his job or may be transferred to another position with a lower qualification, he must be familiarized with the protocol without fail with a live signature and the date the document was read.

To whom and for what purpose can an extract from the document be provided?

The data from the document for a single employee may be required for the same challenge of the decision in court or for upgrading the category, which is relevant for teachers. And since it is not advisable to provide the entire protocol in its entirety, and the law on the dissemination of personal data does not allow, an extract is generated that reflects information for only one employee.

The results of the attestation should be fixed in a special protocol signed by the members of the attestation commission. Further, the relevant employees should be familiarized with this document against signature. Subsequently, on the basis of the protocol, the head of the company will make organizational decisions.

The rules for drawing up the protocol and the composition of the information that should be reflected in it should be fixed in a special provision on the certification of employees (see also our article Compiling a regulation on the certification of employees - a sample), since the Labor Code of the Russian Federation does not contain clear instructions for this account and is supplemented in this part by federal laws regulating certain areas of activity (clause 2, article 12.1 of the law “On transport security» dated February 9, 2007 No. 16-FZ, art. 48 of the Law "On the State Civil Service of the Russian Federation" dated July 27, 2004 No. 79-FZ, etc.).

For some government agencies, there are still approved and recommended forms for the protocols of the attestation commission (see order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia dated March 14, 2012 No. 170, etc.).

Attestation protocol (download sample)

A unified sample of the protocol of the attestation commission based on the results of attestation at the legislative level has not been approved, and, as we indicated above, the rules for its execution are regulated by the organization's local documentation.

An example protocol structure might look like this:

  • name of the document, place and date of its compilation, document number;
  • the list of members of the attestation commission present at the meeting;
  • agenda;
  • Full name of the person being certified, a list of questions asked to him and an assessment of the answers received;
  • decision of the members of the attestation commission: assessment of the professional suitability of the person being certified, recommendations;
  • voting results for the proposed assessment;
  • signatures of committee members.

An example of such a protocol can be downloaded from the link below: Protocol for attestation of employees - sample.

So, the protocol for attestation of employees can be drawn up in a free format in accordance with the requirements of the local documentation of the employer organization, since the unified / standard form of the form for this moment not developed. In the future, this protocol should be familiarized with the attested workers against signature.

The protocol of the meeting of the attestation commission for compliance with the position held is the most important document, the fate of attestation and attested employees depends on the correct execution of it. Consider in the material what requirements for form and content it must meet.

Employee certification

AT Labor Code RF certification, which confirmed the inconsistency of the employee with the position held or the work performed, is mentioned as a condition for his dismissal at the initiative of the employer (clause 3, part 1, article 81 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation). It is regulated by the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in general terms only for scientists and teaching staff (Article 336.1 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation).

For most employees, certification for compliance with the position held is not regulated by law.

This means that the decision on the need for its implementation is made by the employer independently. And only for certain categories of workers, it is necessary to conduct it by virtue of the law (prosecutors, employees of the Investigative Committee, rescuers, aviation personnel, library workers, etc.).

Personnel appraisal is a check by the employer professional qualities employees in order to identify the compliance of their qualifications with the positions held or the work performed. Can be checked:

  • professional skills;
  • business qualities;
  • theoretical knowledge;
  • ability to apply them in work practice.

Regulations on the certification of personnel

In order to be able to conduct certification for employees for whom it is not mandatory, the organization first needs to develop and approve a regulation (or other document) on the certification procedure.

With this local normative act, providing for its conditions and regulating procedural issues, it is necessary to familiarize the employees against signature.

The certification itself is complicated procedure, which must comply with the procedure approved by the regulation. An important place in it is occupied by the minutes of the meeting of the certification commission for compliance with the position held.

After the certification, if the employee is confirmed to be inconsistent with the position he occupies (the work performed) and he rejects another job offered by the employer, the employer has the right to start the dismissal procedure established by Art. Art. 81,, 84.1 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation.

If the employee objects to the dismissal and initiates a labor dispute in court, then a properly executed minutes of the meeting of the certification commission can prove the employer's rightness, since it will confirm the objectivity of the certification results.

Regulation on certification: section on the protocol

It is advisable to describe in detail in the regulation the procedure for keeping minutes of the meeting of the attestation commission.

It is advisable to submit its form there, as well as regulate the procedure for approving the protocol by members of the commission.

Usually, one protocol is drawn up for each meeting of the commission.

At the same time, it is better to enter data for each employee separately, since when filling out their answers in solid text, it is difficult to correctly determine whose answer and evaluate it. Therefore, in the event of a labor dispute, such a protocol may not be recognized as evidence of the inconsistency of the employee's qualifications with the position held.

The protocol must contain mandatory details (name of the document, date and number of the minutes of the commission meeting, date and place of the meeting), as well as a list of those present, the agenda, headings for parts of the meeting, the decision made by the commission and recommendations for the employer.

Lists should be attached to it. questions asked with answers for each employee.

The protocol is signed by the chairman and secretary of the attestation commission.

Certified sign in familiarization with it.

The period during which such a protocol is kept is 15 years.


Present:

Full name - Deputy Director for BP;

Full name - primary school teacher, head of the MO of primary school teachers;

Full name - teacher of the Russian language and literature, head of the MO of teachers of the philological cycle;

Full name - teacher in English, head of the ShMO class teachers.

Agenda

    Responsibilities of the members of the evaluation committee.

    Approval of the work plan and topics of the commission's meetings.

HEARD: Chairman of the FI Attestation Commission. about the duties of the members of the attestation commission.

DECIDED: Impose the following duties on the members of the attestation commission:

Maintenance of attestation documentation - full name, secretary of the attestation commission;

Control and assistance on issues professional discipline– full name, chairman of the PC, deputy chairman of the attestation commission;

Control and assistance to teachers on educational work - full name;

Control and assistance to primary school teachers - full name;

Control and assistance in working with gifted children - full name;

Control and assistance in extracurricular activities - full name;

HEARD: Secretary of the Attestation Commission Full Name on the approval of the plan and topics of the meetings.

SPEAKER: Name with a proposal to make adjustments to the work plan as necessary.

RESOLVED: To approve the work plan of the attestation commission for 2016-2017 this year.

Commission members:

Protocol

05.10.2016 No. 2

Present:

Chairman of the attestation commission - full name, director of the school

Deputy chairman of the attestation commission - full name, chairman of the PC, teacher of mathematics, computer science.

Secretary of the attestation commission - full name, deputy director for water resources management

Members of the certification committee:

Full name. - primary school teacher, head of the MO of primary school teachers;

Full name. - teacher of the Russian language and literature, head of the MO of teachers of the philological cycle;

Agenda

    On the certification of school teachers in the 2016/2017 academic year.

Full nameon certification of teaching staff of the school in the 2016/2017 academic year.

DECIDED:

    In accordance with federal law of the Russian Federation dated December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ “On education in Russian Federation”, guided by clauses 5-23 of section 2 of the Procedure for attestation of teaching staff of organizations that carry out educational activities, approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated April 07, 2014 No. No. 276 “On approval of the Procedure for attestation of teaching staff of organizations engaged in educational activities”, in pursuance of the order of the Ministry of Education of Crimea dated November 24, 2014 No. 01-14 / 1884 “On methodological recommendations for the certification of teaching staff, in order to confirm compliance with the position held” with in order to legally regulate relations in the field of education and stimulate a targeted, continuous improvement of the level of qualification of teaching staff, their methodological culture, to approve the list of teachers subject to certification in the 2016/2017 academic year:

    1. Full name - chemistry teacher;

      Full name - English teacher;

      Full name - primary school teacher.

Chairman of the attestation commission: full name

Secretary of the attestation commission: full name

Commission members:

Protocol

meetings of the attestation commission

03/17/2017 No. 3

Present:

Chairman of the attestation commission - full name, director of the school

Deputy Chairman of the Attestation Commission-TFIO, Chairman of the PC, teacher of mathematics, computer science.

Secretary of the attestation commission - full name, deputy director for water resources management

Members of the certification committee:

Full name - Deputy Director for BP;

Mironova E. N. - primary school teacher, head of the MO of primary school teachers;

Full name - teacher of the Russian language and literature, head of the Ministry of Defense of teachers of the philological cycle;

Full name - English teacher, head of the ShMO class teachers.

Certified teaching staff -Full namechemistry teacher;

Agenda

Certification of teaching staff of the MOU "Medvedev School" in order to

confirmation of the compliance of teachers with the positions they hold based on an assessment of their professional activities:

Full name. - teacher of chemistry;

Full name - English teacher;

Full name - primary school teacher

HEARD: Chairman of the Attestation Commission, School PrincipalFull nameabout the results of certification of an English teacherFull name

Full name.,

Full name- Member of the certification committee. In her speech, she stated thatFull nameconstantly working to improve his professional level. Lessons are conducted at a good organizational and pedagogical level. Works in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of the second generation.

Abibullaev A.Sh.Full name - Deputy Chairman of the Attestation Commission. In his speech, he pointed out that the full name in his lessons actively uses innovative methods learning.

DECIDED:Full nameEnglish teacher corresponds to the position.

HEARD: Chairman of the Attestation Commission, School PrincipalFull nameon the results of certification of primary school teachersFull name

SPEAKER: Secretary of the Attestation CommissionFull namewhich acquainted the members of the commission with the course of attestation.

Full name- Member of the certification committee. In her speech, she pointed out what a teacher carries out a differentiated approach in the lessons of the Russian language and mathematics. Half

the students taught by it have a sufficient and high level of educational achievements.

Full nameFull nameorganizes extracurricular work in subjects: Olympiads, subject weeks.

DECIDED:Full namePrimary school teacher, appropriate position.

HEARD: Deputy Chairman of the Attestation Commission, teacher of mathematics, computer scienceFull nameabout the results of certification of a teacher of chemistryFull name

SPEAKER: Secretary of the Attestation CommissionFull namewhich acquainted the members of the commission with the course of attestation.

Full name- Member of the certification committee. In her speech, she spoke aboutFull nameperfectly masters the methodology of the modern lesson. Skillfully combines traditional and innovative educational technologies. When conducting lessons, take into account the features educational material and student abilities.

Full name- member of the certification committee. In her presentation, she pointed out thatFull nameprovides practical assistance to colleagues. Makes proposals to improve the educational process at school.

DECIDED:Full nameteacher of chemistry, corresponds to the position held.

Chairman of the attestation commission: full name

Secretary of the attestation commission: full name

Commission members:

CERTIFICATION

2016-2017

SCHOOL YEAR

avtovsamare.ru - My business - Franchises. Ratings. Success stories. Ideas. Work and education

Mass media registration certificate EL No. FS 77 - 57771 dated April 18, 2014.
Copyright © 2006-2017. All materials are protected by copyright
Mass media "BusinessGarant" is registered by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technologies and Mass Communications