So who is lying in the Special Administrative Okrug? Confession of the police. How does a law enforcement officer live in Russia? Veretelnikov was removed from office.
From 08/07/1991 to 10/10/1994 he headed the Internal Affairs Directorate
Police Colonel Andriets Evgeniy Nikolaevich
(appointed to the position by order of the Moscow City Internal Affairs Directorate dated August 7, 1991 No. 128).
From 10.10.1994 to 22.05.2002 he headed the Internal Affairs Directorate
Police Colonel Vladimir Anatolyevich Zamyatin
(appointed to the position by order of the Moscow City Internal Affairs Directorate dated October 4, 1994 No. 978), by Presidential Decree of May 6, 1996 No. 162, he was awarded the rank of police major general, and by Presidential Decree of June 17, 1999 he was awarded the Order of Honor.
From July 16, 2002 to July 21, 2011, he headed the Internal Affairs Directorate
Police Colonel Sofin Ravil Alekseevich
(appointed to the position by order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs dated October 4, 1994 No. 978), by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated November 8, 2003 No. 1316, he was awarded the rank of police major general.
From July 26, 2011 to January 11, 2012, he headed the Internal Affairs Directorate
General - Major of Police Trutnev Viktor Nikolaevich
(By Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated July 26, 2011 No. 993, he was appointed to the position and awarded the rank of police major general).
From 01.2012 to 01.2014 he headed the Internal Affairs Directorate
Police Colonel Igor Viktorovich Zinoviev
(appointed by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 17, 2011 No. 1655), by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of June 16, 2013, awarded the rank of police major general, by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of July 19, 2001 No. 881, awarded the medal of the Order “For Services to the Fatherland” 2 degrees and a number of departmental awards.
From 06.2014 to 08.2017 he headed the Internal Affairs Directorate
General - Major of Police Sergei Ivanovich Veretelnikov
(appointed to the position by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated June 12, 2014 No. 418, the title was awarded by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated January 20, 2016 No. 73). He has state awards: the Order of the Red Star, the medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, 2nd class, and a number of departmental awards. Has a premium firearm (Makarov pistol) and a bladed premium weapon (dagger).
from 06.2018 to the present, head of the Internal Affairs Directorate
Police Colonel Alexey Nikolaevich Ionov
(appointed to the position by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated June 4, 2018 No. 288)
has state and departmental awards: Order of Courage, medal "For Distinction in Service" III degree, II degree and I degree.
The meeting of the officers' meeting at the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Molzhaninovsky district was not entirely ordinary. The reason for holding it was so significant that the head of the district department, Major General of Police Sergei VERETELNIKOV, and the head of the Department of Moral and Psychological Support (UMPO) of the capital's headquarters, Colonel of the Internal Service, Viktor GORDUN, were invited to attend.
The department officers discussed the actions of their former colleague, investigator Sokolov. He took money from the offender. Migrant's patent to conduct labor activity was invalid, but Sokolov was ready to “settle” the issue for 40 thousand rubles. The former police major valued his integrity and conscience at this price.
Those gathered unanimously regarded the action of a former colleague (he was fired from the police) as discrediting honor police officer. However, senior leaders helped them scrupulously and conscientiously identify the causes and conditions conducive to the crime.
The fact is that the speeches of Sokolov’s colleagues, as well as his immediate superior, at first boiled down to the standard “overlooked and underdone” and promises to improve the quality of individual educational work in the department.
The district director present at the meeting set a more critical tone for the conversation. Sergei Ivanovich analyzed in detail the chronology of both the act itself and the events that led Sokolov to bribery.
In this series, it was clearly indicated that the violator’s immediate superior was spineless. The young woman, who had recently headed the investigation department, simply could not cope with an authoritative and experienced subordinate. And he behaved much more freely than the others. This connivance on the part of the boss led to the fact that the former investigator ended up with unregistered and unassigned material in his hands regarding a migrant who worked with an expired patent. The illusion of easy money turned the officer’s head, and the service own safety The Internal Affairs Directorate for the Northern Administrative District of Moscow recorded the fact of the transfer of a bribe to a police officer.
The head of the capital's UMPO warned the former officer's colleagues against a condescending and sympathetic attitude towards him. He rejected the use of language such as “got into trouble.” Viktor Pavlovich noted that Sokolov did not hit, but deliberately created this situation. And now the entire team “fell” into it by the grace of the bribe-taker. And, of course, based on information about the lifestyle of the former interrogator, noted by UMPO employees, his crime should be interpreted only as a recorded fact, quite possibly not an isolated one.
The conversation was not only about the investigator’s misconduct, but also about the phenomenon of corruption in the police ranks in general. The audience was shown a documentary-chronicle film compiled from materials regarding bribe-taking police officers who had been detained recently. The leitmotif of the videotape was the inevitability of exposing this type of crime among law enforcement officers.
It is now up to the newly appointed head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Molzhaninovsky district, Lieutenant Colonel of the Internal Service, Anton Sankin, who took up his duties at a difficult moment for the department, to understand and draw conclusions within the team. At a meeting of the officers' meeting, he was introduced to the personnel. The managers expressed confidence that the new boss would cope with the assigned tasks, in particular, creating an atmosphere of intolerance towards bribe-takers in the department, and organize work in the right direction.
Artyom KIRPICHEV,
photo by Alexander NESTEROV
Confession of the police. How does a law enforcement officer live in Russia?
The first story was told by Svetlana Belousova, police captain of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Northern Administrative District of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in Moscow. She had to fight not only against the arbitrariness of her superiors and attempts at illegal dismissal, but against family violence and the mutual responsibility of law enforcement, investigative and judicial authorities:
I have been serving in the Ministry of Internal Affairs since the end of 2007 and at first I was in good relations with the management, there were no complaints about me. True, I immediately had to deal with the “specifics” of the system. I remember, when I was still an intern, I interrogated a person who was in the status of a victim, and from his testimony it turned out that he himself had committed a criminal offense. But then it turned out that he already had agreements that he would be interrogated purely formally, to maintain order under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. And when I presented his interrogation, the material was immediately transferred to another interrogator, and he had already drawn up another interrogation, where there was no corpus delicti in the actions of the alleged “victim,” and they hinted to me that management might hit me on the head. After that, until I took office, at the trainee stage the management did not allow me near criminal proceedings, although I asked to be included in the work as quickly as possible.
The fish rots from the head. Formally, we should be independent, but de facto we are all directly dependent on the heads of departments, who depend on the leadership of the internal affairs department, and they, in turn, depend on the district leadership, and so on. And if you come across illegal actions and try to appeal them (as was the case in my case), you go through all the authorities, but it turns out to be impossible to achieve any result.
Many problems arise due to the “stick system”. Particularly affected are the district police officers, from whom indicators are required. And if there is nowhere to take it from, then they are made “on the knee”. Whether to initiate or, conversely, to hush up a case is decided by the boss, based on the requirements of statistics, and no one argues with him.
This problem also exists in inquests. One day, I received a KUSP audit material, which revealed the fact of theft (Part 1 of Article 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). I interrogated the victim, and from his testimony it turned out that it was not a theft, but a robbery: an elderly man was robbed right in the store, he chased the young criminal, but, of course, did not catch up. I reclassified Part 1 of Art. 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (of minor severity) to a more serious article (Part 1 of Article 161 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), after which the head of the inquiry (the same Sarycheva) gave me a headache, saying, “You’re ruining our statistics, if you do this again, you’ll definitely be thrown out.” From the job".
It also happens, on the contrary, that a criminal case is initiated without sufficient grounds, when they feel that this is not a “hanging fruit.” We had one case where a woman was drinking with unknown young men, then the next morning she discovered that her phone had been stolen, the young men were immediately found and detained, they said that they had not stolen the phone, but confused it with theirs. Then the prosecutor came to our unit and lectured us that they carried out the arrest without making sure that the actions of specific individuals contained signs of a crime, and that this was not the first time. Prosecutors, of course, do not like to deal with situations where the crime is not obvious. If it turns out that a person was innocent, then this falls under Article 299 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Bringing a knowingly innocent person to criminal liability,” and citizens are now becoming more literate, have learned to apply to the European Court of Human Rights and compensate for material damage.
More than once they tried to force me to initiate criminal cases without a legal basis, or to impose on me, under the threat of failure to comply with orders, such “live” cases for which I could end up in places not so distant.
My problems started in July 2012. Lieutenant Colonel Shmerkin postponed my vacation to September and instructed me to take over a criminal case in which the victim asked to take back his car, which was found after the theft. The prosecutor's office demanded an urgent report on this car. It was with difficulty that we managed to find the empty criminal case abandoned in the archive; it lay there even without suspension. I was ordered to suspend it retroactively.
And then I started receiving calls from the prosecutor’s office asking: “Where is the car?” Stop it - there is no car either in our area or even in the Northern District. But we have an unwritten rule: whoever filed the case last is responsible. In general, I was set up. They brought him under criminal charges.
Fortunately, on the third day, having traveled all over Moscow, I found a car in the Orekhovo-Borisovo area in the traffic police parking lot. Who used it and how it got there – I still don’t know.
But this was only the beginning of troubles.
Our workload was enormous, and every day I stayed at work until 10-11 pm, since I planned to work out the remaining criminal cases by the end of July (for vacation). And this despite the fact that at that time the computers in my office were faulty and there was not a single permanent printer (I had to buy it at my own expense), the lighting was also terrible.
In order to quickly hush up the scandal with the car, my bosses immediately sent me on leave, and when I returned to work on the first working day, I had to meet my new head of the investigation department - police major Lyubov Aleksandrovna Sarycheva. From the first minute our acquaintance went like this. Seeing me in her office working on the photocopier, Sarycheva asked: “Who are you?” (Her address as “you” was normal for her). - “I am Belousova.” - "You are fired!"
The reason for my dismissal was that she decided: I have too many unfulfilled “hangs,” although these criminal cases were saddled with me on the eve of the sudden aforementioned vacation. But I think the hangings were an excuse, and the real reason is that I have in my hands Small child. The management didn't like the fact that I was in maternity leave, then on sick leave to care for a child, although I still managed to cope with work, staying late or working during my lunch break.
I didn’t want to leave work myself and Sarycheva began to squeeze me out. She asked her friend Tarasova (at that time - the curator of the district department of inquiry) to give me a severe reprimand because of these same “penalties” (and a reprimand immediately meant a double loss in salary). There, in Tarasova’s office, I was directly told that a reprimand would be followed by “incomplete service” with further dismissal, that is, without the possibility of reinstatement in law enforcement service. But until that time I had never had a single criticism in my work. I turned for help to the head of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Northern Administrative District, Colonel Zinoviev, he ordered an inspection, after which my superiors, covering themselves, replaced the strict reprimand with a regular one, and kept my salary.
Later I found out that this Sarycheva is a famous person who has been involved in many scandals, for example, when she got drunk with strange men, drove around Moscow with them, and then forgot where she parked the car and reported it stolen.
In addition, I discovered that signatures were forged on my behalf in criminal cases, and a case was opened on my behalf. This is our normal practice. I myself was somehow obliged to suspend the case on behalf of another investigator, who was on vacation at that time.
There were many more examples of how they tried to force me out of work, but the last straw was the situation related to my personal life. I have a difficult relationship with the father of my child. Once he beat me so hard that he almost strangled me in front of my three-year-old son, and at work, instead of protecting me from violence, they began to peck me. Because of the child, I could not avoid meeting and communicating with the tyrant; I was afraid that one day, in an uncontrollable rage, he would definitely kill me. I had to somehow stop him, because I couldn’t give a physical rebuff, since in terms of weight category he is much larger than me and has been systematically training for many years different types struggle.
As a result, I went to the magistrate’s court, I had a certificate from a traumatology department and a clinical hospital report, but in response he filed a counterclaim - as if I myself had beaten and slandered him. Of course, he did not have any certificates of damage and could not have had them, but Magistrate Maria Patyk, without any trial, brought me to criminal liability for beatings and slander! From a victim, I instantly turned into an accused - and this means inevitable dismissal from the authorities. As it turned out later, the reason for making such a decision was that she terribly did not like the media attention to my trial.
As a result, on March 22, 2013, I had to submit an application to terminate the criminal case and abandon the filed private prosecution. The child's father (Yu.I. Privalikhin) also asked to drop the criminal case and refused the counter-statement of the private prosecution. But the judge, instead of simply closing the case, dismissed it “in connection with the reconciliation of the parties” (although there was no reconciliation between us), and such wording also leads to dismissal - and on February 6, 2014, I was fired on non-rehabilitating grounds.
You can’t imagine what it’s like to be fired on such grounds, and even to end up in all accounting databases as a criminal. Left with a small child in my arms, without any outside help, alone, as a criminally prosecuted person, I could not find a job. Saved a child from hunger kindergarten. Due to the lack of financial ability to buy the necessary medicine for 500 rubles, I almost lost my leg.
A few days later I lost my brother, who was very worried about me and was sick. In her hopeless situation at that time, she could not help him in any way and even come to his funeral several thousand kilometers away on time. Upon arrival, the body had to be exhumed, since the local funeral home had set up a mass grave with an unknown person in an abandoned cemetery.
On August 1, 2014, the Presidium of the Moscow City Court admitted that “the court of 1st instance erroneously applied the norm of the criminal procedure law, referring to Part 2 of Art. 20 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, which provides for the termination of a criminal case in connection with the reconciliation of the parties,” I ceased to be considered a criminal. Then, on November 28, 2014, I defended my right to be reinstated in the service in the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation, took out a bank loan to buy food - this is how my global financial issue was resolved.
The way they treated me at work is no exception; let’s say, in our department there was an employee who worked hard for two people, wanted to transfer to a promotion, but there was no one who wanted to let him go. So they deliberately tore out pages from the materials of criminal cases in order to prevent him from leaving, and threatened him with criminal liability for the lost material. He, however, left after about two years anyway.
After reinstatement through the court, I was supposed to receive a salary for the entire period of forced absence, but the head of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Northern Administrative District of Moscow, Major General Veretelnikov, not only did not pay me my salary, but decided to illegally fire me again.
The second story is the story of Moscow district police officer Alexander Eremenko. At first, he discovered that it was absolutely impossible to make a career without participating in corruption schemes. And then I realized from my own experience that if you leave the system, you can become its victim: his apartment, with the active participation of police officers, was taken away by raiders, and he himself ended up in the hospital:
In addition to our main activity, we are constantly faced with illegal instructions from our superiors; this could be, for example, an inspection of some entrepreneur so that he eventually goes to his boss to “negotiate”. At the same time, whether the boss shares with ordinary police officers depends on how the relationship is built.
Another common option is that a crime has occurred, the employees have left, at this time they are already negotiating with the manager, and there is an instruction either not to collect material at all, or to collect it in such a way as to ruin the case.
There is another popular corruption scheme: let’s say, migrant workers living illegally are evicted from an apartment, the apartment goes to the state, and if you are in good standing in the system, they let you move in (although formally the apartment should be empty). And if anything happens, you can be thrown out onto the street at any moment; this is also one of the tools to keep employees in line.
You can, of course, not participate in this (I, say, did not participate and, to the best of my competence, fought against the illegal occupation of apartments and basements), but then you will be immediately thrown out of the system, so only a few refuse. Well, besides, for an ordinary employee, illegal income usually makes up more than half of his earnings (and for his superiors, this is the main source of income).
I served for 15 years and left with the rank of captain, although during this time you can reach the rank of colonel - but it is impossible to get a promotion if you yourself do not participate in corruption schemes. That’s why I left, they didn’t give me any growth, and looking at this whole corrupt system, realizing that you couldn’t influence anything, was not for me. Moreover, they themselves squeezed me out - they gave me irregular working hours, not like everyone else, they did not sign decisions on my materials, etc.
My main troubles began after my divorce from my wife Elena Eremenko in 2012, we divided the property in half, no one had any complaints. At first she took her son Danya and did not allow him to communicate with him, but then she brought him back and practically lost interest in him (from then on he lived with me until the robbery, which she organized, she took him to kindergarten and clinics then too I). We had an apartment on Yeseninsky Boulevard with a mortgage, and although I paid the mortgage (Elena was on maternity leave), we also divided the apartment in half. After the divorce, we ourselves still lived in a different apartment (me and my son in one room, she in another), but after Elena got drunk, started a fight and hit the child (this was in December 2014), I took Danya and moved to an apartment on Yeseninsky Boulevard.
It was then that it turned out that Elena secretly rented out this apartment to certain realtors from Kyrgyzstan, who, in turn, rented out this apartment to another 15 tenants (also from Kyrgyzstan). So that the police would not have any questions, they paid the district police officer 3 thousand a month. The tenants were evicted, I washed the apartment, poisoned the cockroaches, Elena then called herself and seemed ready to calmly discuss issues of peaceful separate coexistence.
I began to live in the apartment with my son. On the night of January 15-16, we had friends with children visiting us (considering that I raised my son myself, I began to communicate with mothers who raise children themselves), that is, the second victim Irina Petrakova and her two small children, we Unknown people began to break down the doors. We called the police and shouted to the attackers that there were small children in our apartment, but this did not stop them - they knocked down the doors, 9 people broke into the apartment, they beat us and robbed us. After the beating, I ended up in the Sklifosovsky hospital.
As it turned out later, the police arrived on call 112, but downstairs they were met by police officers with Elena Eremenko and explained that they had already arrived to the call and were “looking into it,” but in fact they were covering up the crime (this is confirmed by the neighbors; they also called the police several times from your phone). The police officers calmly watched what was happening and stopped the attackers only when I had completely lost consciousness and was almost strangled.
Yes, I submitted an application to the local police officer against the police, but it was refused consideration (which is not surprising, since the local police officer regularly received money from the attackers).
Probably, we could have tried to use old connections, but I tried to act according to the law. Those policemen knew that I was a former policeman, but they didn’t care - if you are a “former”, the system no longer protects you.
I put all the non-stolen things and documents into the car (the door to the apartment was not locked). The bandits broke the glass in the car and stole everything that was left.
After numerous complaints, a criminal case was finally opened, but against “unidentified persons,” although the names of the attackers were well known to me and the police. The “forensic medical examination” also decided that “there was no harm to health,” although the doctors at the hospital made a different conclusion - a suspicion of a compression fracture of the spine, a concussion, a closed craniocerebral injury, multiple bruises, wounds, abrasions, bruises, harm moderate health... They didn’t want to let me out of the hospital at all, but I had to somehow file lawsuits and defend myself. (And then it turned out that the examination was carried out only on part of the medical documents... And without my participation...)
In August 2015, my ex-wife began calling and demanding that I pay her alimony. I explained to her that for this I need to get a job, which I have not been able to do since February 2015 (as it should have been), since she and her people stole all my documents in January, without which it is impossible to do this ( and the police didn’t give me a certificate of theft of documents either, and apparently not by chance...). Soon after this conversation, somewhere in the South-Western Administrative District they found my briefcase, which was stolen from a car (criminal case No. 5022), where my documents lay mixed with those that my ex-wife Elena stole from the apartment (case No. 5066). But investigators still don’t want to combine these cases! Thanks to the active efforts of the head of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the South-Eastern Administrative District, Major General Pishchulin, and his subordinates, criminal cases are deliberately reduced to “everyday affairs” and under this pretext they have been “dragging around” for the second year now.
After this, Elena Eremenko, as she had threatened, sold the rights to her share to “black realtors,” apparently forging my signature for documents in Rosreestr. After that, accompanied by police officers, “black realtors” - V.V. Ivanov - moved into the apartment, with a break-in, threats and without a court decision. and Ivanova E.A. My apartment, as it turned out later, is already the fourth from which they are kicking out the owners. Their methods are very simple - attacks, violence, theft, threats, etc. As I later found out, they spend the money they earned from raiding, among other things, on their three children (all of them study at the Olympic reserve school, future champions). Three attacks and traumatic brain injuries in two weeks and, of course, it turned out to be impossible to live with them in the same apartment, I had to move out.
The Insider asked for comment on these life stories an experienced employee of the Investigative Committee, who previously worked for many years in the prosecutor's office, knows the police system well from his side. By the way, this employee also has his own story, which he promises to tell a little later, when he uses all the opportunities to protect his rights through the court.
“Earnings in the system (be it the Ministry of Internal Affairs or investigative agencies) depend on status. Ordinary employees of the PPS and traffic police, no matter how hard they try, will not collect much; the one who sits in the central office receives more in a day than a dozen ordinary employees collect in a week, or maybe even a month. After all, he resolves serious issues - for example, the initiation of a criminal case (or refusal to initiate).
When I heard about the story of Alexander Eremenko and the raiders, I was shocked. Because I would be in his place (and any other employee in his place) would take my guys from the department, come to this apartment, beat all these “black realtors” to a pulp and explain that if they appear in this apartment, then we will kill all of you, together with your relatives. I myself have had situations when, while still an ordinary assistant investigator, I came to a pre-trial detention center and when the accused went to the prison hospital and said “but they won’t even take me to you,” I told him in vivid colors what would happen to him then, and he left how cute.
Cases when “black realtors” encounter “systemic” police are rare, but if something like this happens by mistake, then, I think, they will give you an apartment and give you money in addition. There are, however, situations when there are clashes between security forces on one side and the other. Then the issue is resolved based on who each side has a choice on. At the same time, the structure itself is not so important, what is important is the level of “roof”, that is, some employees of the Federal Penitentiary Service can defeat even FSB employees if they have access to the leadership (although this, of course, is rare). After all, going “to the top” is a way to huge money.
It’s almost impossible to get “to the top” just like that, all the places are occupied by thieves. All unnecessary people are eliminated very simply - for example, through “psychological testing” or a polygraph. In both cases, everything depends on the interpretation of the results and any candidate can be killed.
But those who get the position will no longer disappear. If you are at least the deputy head of an insurance department, then your car should start at 2 million, less is bad manners. I myself have been offered bribes more than once, even when I was only an assistant investigator. It sounded like this: “If a couple of pages disappear from this criminal case when you take it to court, then we will buy you a Mercedes instead of a Lada.” Or they offered money to transfer a prisoner from one cell to another. I have never agreed to such deals, but most employees, of course, give in to temptation from time to time.
We have built a strict hierarchical system of cronyism and corruption; being, soot, an ordinary employee of the teaching staff, you cannot help but take bribes, because your superiors will demand a certain amount from you. Of course, if you are the son of some boss or the son of the head of the district, then they will not demand from you, but you will not work for a long time in an ordinary position anyway, you will quickly be promoted to the top. The Investigative Committee has the same corruption-hierarchical system as the police, only the scale of bribes is much higher. The police deal mostly with petty thefts, domestic quarrels - what kind of bribes are there, but the Investigative Committee is already dealing with serious criminal cases. And in the IC, too, part of the bribes goes to the top. At what level this chain ends, I don’t know, I don’t think it ends at all.
You can be punished for corruption only in one case - if you have become disliked by someone in the system. And all official measures are simply profanity. It was forbidden to have state property abroad. For what? Let’s say I’m an employee of the Investigative Committee, and my wife was born, say, in Moldova or Ukraine, and she left an apartment or a house from her parents. Now it is declared illegal. Why on earth? At the same time, those corrupt officials who actually have a villa in Miami will simply transfer it to their parents and be done with it.”
We received a response from the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Northern Administrative District to our letter, in which we provided comments from employees about the state of affairs in the territorial divisions.
Here is the letter, and the answer is in the attached files. It (the answer) says that the information has not been confirmed.
Ref. No. 01
01/20/2015
"Information mail"
TO THE HEAD OF THE ATC FOR THE SAO GU MIA
RUSSIA AROUND MOSCOW
S.I. VERETELNIKOV
Dear Sergei Ivanovich!
The trade union of police officers in Moscow, through a survey on its website, collected information regarding the service of employees of units subordinate to the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Northern Administrative District of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Moscow.
When analyzing the information received, systematic complaints from employees about violations of their labor rights established by the current federal and intradepartmental legislation, namely: non-compliance with established service schedules, lack of accounting for overtime, failure to provide time off, the “stick system” for recording work results, shortage of personnel, and, as a result, increased workload on working employees, as well as lack of information on bonuses for personnel based on performance.
Especially negative reviews received information about the work of the Department of Internal Affairs in the Begovaya district, the Department of Internal Affairs in the Khovrino district, and the Department of Internal Affairs in the Dmitrovsky district.
You can obtain additional information on the Trade Union website at the address: in the section “What is happening in your unit.”
In reporting the above, we ask:
Check in the district divisions specified in the application, compliance with the order of service and labor rights of employees established by current legislation and departmental regulations.
If the facts set out in this appeal are confirmed, take the necessary measures to restore the violated rights of employees and organize their normal work activities.
Consider the issue of bringing to disciplinary liability officials, guilty of violations of the labor rights of employees.
We ask you to notify the Trade Union in writing of the measures and decisions taken on this appeal within the period prescribed by law.
Appendix: on 2 sheets.
Sincerely -
Chairman of the Coordination Council of the Trade Union
Member of the extended working group
on reforming internal affairs bodies
under the Minister Russian Federation
Member expert council under the Government of the Russian Federation M.P. Pashkin
Spanish Konstantinova Irina Borisovna
8-495-694-77-77
Application
(Internal Affairs Directorate for the Northern Administrative District of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Moscow)
Victor 11/25/2014 11:30
I won’t name the office, it’s fraught, but I think the situation is the same in other districts! Time off? I don’t know what it is, if sick leave is not extended, we are not given time off, citing a lack of personnel. We are two employees in the service, we are on duty 24 hours a day, and in the meantime we manage to respond to alarms, which have increased quite a lot lately and all sorts of other nonsense. The employees are treated like cattle, no attention or help, the main thing is that the edges are shaved, but the fact that they are on their feet for three days doesn’t bother anyone! The sticks are the same as they demanded, they describe the materials without reading or delving into what service it is intended for, in a word, pitchforks! I won’t say anything about the leaders, everyone will be rewarded according to their deeds, there’s even no one to single out!
Nikola 25.11.2014 15:36
At the Khovrino Department of Internal Affairs, the head of the department, Colonel Stasyukevich, absolutely rightly demands that employees fulfill their official duties. Doesn't scream. doesn't swear. behaves correctly. However, he does not want to understand that there are not enough police officers - 4 people, detectives - 2 people, investigators - almost 2 people left (two are leaving, one is on maternity leave), D/H - 2 people, PDN - a set, so the same as all bosses.
Alexander 25.11.2014 22:35
I wanted to transfer to the DC at the Begovaya police station (this was in 2010), I went into the department to talk with the officers on duty, to find out, so to speak, how the situation was, how the management treated the employees, etc. It was a kick-ass! At that time, the work schedule of the DC was a day or two, and that day the duty officer worked alone! I talked to him, he says it’s been 1.5 months already. that’s how it works and this is as punishment for the fact that he dared to take sick leave. And so it will work until another day. something will not be punished in the same way.
SHERIFF 11/27/2014 01:30
About the Department of Internal Affairs of Khovrino I can explain the following: during the arrival of the head of the department Stasyukevich (and this is 1.5 weeks), the investigation fell apart, the ESD is being sewn up, the district police are not only sleeping on the support, but simply living there, the police officers are not doing their job at all. The attitude of the department head towards his subordinates (even his deputies) is like cattle - he doesn’t listen to anyone, he does as he wants, the department has a complete army from the times of the USSR. Daily assignments and duty shifts are handed over until 14:00 the next day; between nights, the teaching staff also sits at the duty station until lunch. Managers now work 7/7 and 24 hours a day. ENOUGH TOLERATING THIS!!! I would really like this cry from the soul to reach the ears of the employees of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Moscow.
diablo 30.11.2014 16:08
Time off for overtime is not provided. Forced to work on weekends and holidays and they don't pay extra for it. After 24 hours, you can sit in the department until the evening and finish tasks and materials, and the next day you must be at work by 9. The bosses don't care about their employees or the needs of their subordinates. Sticks are required from all services. If an employee’s child gets sick and she takes sick leave, they immediately look askance and force her to leave anyway, even if you come with the child. I don't want to continue working. People quit, new ones don’t take their places, and for those who remain, the workload has increased 2-3 times. People get tired both physically and mentally. We either have volcanoes or anxiety, instead of giving people the opportunity to work. Prizes are only promised.
Nick 05.12.2014 00:53
I would like to add about d/h. Almost everyone works a day or two, plus incomprehensible studies, tests, etc. All this either after 24 hours or on weekends. Of course, no one will compensate for this. The last shifts I worked with the local police officers, because... There were four living duty officers left. They have come up with a heap of electronic KUSP in addition to the written one, and there is even more work. I would like to know when they will deign to at least add more staff, because... The labor code does not provide for working 24 hours a day.
Cop 01/08/2015 20:04
OMVD Dmitrovsky again distinguished itself, something serious happened there! I wouldn’t be surprised that the local leaders get away with anything!
Sasha 01/16/2015 00:43
Yes, there is such a thing, there is an employee, or rather his fingers surfaced on stolen cars, he is wanted by the federal authorities, no one has seen him since the end of December 2014, the management carefully hides all this so as not to get hit in the head, still not a single manager they punished, how could they even hire such an employee who was connected with crime, now everyone else will suffer, because they will definitely take it out on someone else, they will find a scapegoat!
Sasha 01/16/2015 01:05
What is the situation with the provision of time off for overtime?
- How do department heads relate to the needs of employees?
- Which leaders are out of place and why?
- Do they require “sticks”, how many, what kind and who requires them?
- Do you want to continue working in this department and why?
From the above, I can say this: sticks were and are being demanded; the leaders are almost all out of place; time off? what is this? What are employee needs? Should I continue working in this department? In no case, they don’t consider us as people, taking time off means it’s easier to die! As long as management continues to have leaders who do not see the problems of drugs, nothing good will come of it.
OMVD Dmitrovsky!
PS. We need supporting data for some comments. Then we will send it to Glavk for re-checking.
On June 19, the Head of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Moscow, Anatoly Yakunin, introduced the personnel of the Department of Internal Affairs for the Northern administrative district new leader - police colonel Sergei Ivanovich Veretelnikov. The decree on his appointment was signed by the President of the Russian Federation on June 11, 2014. As head of the district department, he replaced Igor Zinoviev, who currently heads the criminal investigation department of the Moscow police.
Introducing police colonel Veretelnikov, the head of the capital's Main Directorate emphasized that the selection of a candidate capable of organizing the work of the internal affairs bodies of the Northern District of the capital was carried out from among more than 100 senior and senior officers of the Federal personnel reserve. The choice was made in favor of Sergei Veretelnikov, based on his professional and personal qualities. “Sergei Ivanovich began his work in the police 20 years ago, and during this time he went through almost all the service levels. As head of the public order department of the Internal Affairs Directorate Novosibirsk region, and subsequently the head of the intermunicipal department “Podolskoe” of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Moscow Region - he established himself as a competent and demanding leader,” said Anatoly Yakunin. Direct confirmation of his words are also the high state awards of Sergei Veretelnikov - the Order of the Red Star and the medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, II degree.
It is noteworthy that the presentation of the new head of the district department took place the day after the solemn ceremony of presenting the banner of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Moscow. In this regard, Anatoly Yakunin called on each employee to rethink their work activities. “Today, Moscow’s internal affairs bodies are under the close attention of civil society,” stressed Anatoly Yakunin. - People’s opinion about security and law and order in the capital, about the entire police force as a whole, depends on how well we work. And this applies to each of the employees - from the private to the head of the Department.”
The head of the Main Directorate reminded those present of the need to protect the rights and legitimate interests of citizens: “The main guidelines for the newly appointed head of the Department should be the principles of strict adherence to accounting and registration discipline, timely response to received requests from Muscovites and guests of the capital. Only in this way will we be able to conduct an open and honest dialogue with citizens, only then will the status and authority of the police officer in the eyes of society grow.”
Anatoly Yakunin wished the new head of the district department good luck in his work and expressed hope that in his responsible position he would be able to achieve all his goals.
In his response, police colonel Sergei Veretelnikov thanked for the high trust and assured those present that in his work he would rely on the rich personnel and intellectual potential of the entrusted unit. And strengthening the best traditions of service, along with the introduction modern methods fight against crime will become the basis for an effective fight against crime.
The prefect of the Northern Administrative District, Vladislav Bazanchuk, was present at the performance. Speaking to the audience, Vladislav Igorevich thanked the law enforcement officers for their fruitful work in ensuring security and assured that the executive authorities will provide the necessary logistical and social support to the police.
Veretelnikov Sergey Ivanovich was born in 1964.
After graduating from the Alma-Ata Higher Combined Arms Command School named after. Marshal Soviet Union I.S. Koneva decided to continue serving in the Armed Forces. From 1986 to 1989 he performed international duty in the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan. For courage and heroism shown in the performance of military duty, he was awarded the Order of the Red Star.
Sergei Ivanovich began his career in the police in 1994 as an inspector in the public order department of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Novosibirsk Region. Then he held the positions of senior inspector, head of department, deputy head of the department for ensuring public order of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Novosibirsk Region.
From 2001 to 2003 he studied at the 1st faculty of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Since 2003 - Head of the Department of Internal Affairs of the Ozersky District of the Main Internal Affairs Directorate of the Moscow Region. For seven years he held leadership positions in various departments of the Moscow Region Central Internal Affairs Directorate. Since 2011, he served as head of the intermunicipal department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia “Podolskoe” of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Moscow Region.
By Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated June 11, 2014, he was appointed to the position of Chief of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Northern Administrative District of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Moscow.
Has state awards: Order of the Red Star, medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, II degree.
Press service of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Moscow
Latest Moscow news on the topic:
Head of the Main Directorate Anatoly Yakunin introduced the new head of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Northern Administrative District, Police Colonel Sergei Veretelnikov
A new head was introduced to the personnel of the Department of Internal Affairs for the Central Administrative District- Moscow
By decree of the President of Russia dated June 11, 2014, police colonel Alexander Bukach was appointed head of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Central Administrative District.
02:05 21.06.2014
Moscow City Department of Internal Affairs
