home Exchange rates Integral assessment of the financial and economic state of the enterprise. Features of the integral assessment of the financial condition of an industrial enterprise in modern economic conditions Integral scoring of financial stability

Integral assessment of the financial and economic state of the enterprise. Features of the integral assessment of the financial condition of an industrial enterprise in modern economic conditions Integral scoring of financial stability

The essence of the methodology for a comprehensive (scoring) assessment of the financial condition of an organization lies in the classification of organizations by the level of financial risk, that is, any organization can be assigned to a certain class depending on the number of points scored, based on the actual values of its financial ratios. Integral scoring of the financial condition of the organization is presented in table. nine.

Table 9. Integral-point assessment of solvency

Odds
Current liquidity ratio
The coefficient of provision with own sources of formation
Accounts receivable turnover ratio
Accounts payable turnover ratio
Return on equity ratio

So, the number of points scored for our enterprise is 36 points (10+8+8+6+4). It can be concluded that the enterprise is solvent, has high profitability, has financial stability and development prospects.

Diagnostics of the probability of bankruptcy

1. Two-factor Altman model

Z \u003d -0.3877-1.0736 * x 1 + 0.579 * x 2

x 1 - current liquidity ratio (2.21)

x 2 - the share of borrowed funds in liabilities (0.019)

Z=-0.3877-1.0736*2.21+0.579*0.019=-2.76+0.011=-2.749

Z<0, т. е. вероятность наступления банкротства не высока

2. Five-factor Altman model

Z=0.717*x 1 +0.847*x 2 +3.107*x 3 +0.42*x 4 +0.995x 5, where

x 1 - working capital to the total assets of the enterprise

x 1 =101540/1458657=0,07

x 2 - retained earnings to the total assets of the enterprise

x 2 =364402/1458657=0,25

x 3 - profit before tax to the total value of assets.

X 3 =143798/1458657=0,1

x 4 -book value of equity

x 4 =1429512/(0+29145)=49,02

X 5 - sales volume to the total assets of the enterprise

x 5 =1087463/1458657=0,74

Z>2.99 stable and financially stable company

3. Model Fox

Z=0.063*x 1 +0.092*х 2 +0.057*х 3 +0.001*х 4

where: x 1 - the ratio of working capital to the amount of assets

x 1 = 0,07

x2 - the ratio of profit from sales to the amount of assets

x 2 \u003d 175018 / 1458657 \u003d 0.11

x 3 - the ratio of retained earnings to the amount of assets

x 3 = 364402/1458657=0,25

x 4 - the ratio of equity to debt

x 4 \u003d 1429512 / (0 + 29145) \u003d 49.02

Z>0.037, i.e. the probability of bankruptcy is not high

4. Model of Taffler and Tishaw.

Z=0.53x1+0.13x2+0.18x3+0.16*x4

x1 is the ratio of profit from sales to short-term liabilities

x1=175016/29145=6

x2 - the ratio of working capital to borrowed

x2= 101540 /(0+29145)=3,49

x3 - the ratio of short-term liabilities to the amount of liabilities

x3=29145/1458657=0.02

x4 - the ratio of revenue from the provision of services to the amount of assets

x4= 1087463/ 1458657 =0,74

Z>0.3 - low probability of bankruptcy

5. Zaitseva's model

Z=0.25*х1+0.1*х2+0.2*х3+0.25*х4+0.1*х5+0.1*х6

х1 - break-even ratio of the enterprise (Normal value х1=0)

х2-ratio of accounts payable and receivable (normal value х2=1)

x2=19536/66102=0.3

x3 is an indicator of the ratio of short-term liabilities and the most liquid assets, this coefficient is reciprocal absolute liquidity indicator (Normal value x3=7)

x3=29145/149+0=195.6

х4 - unprofitable sales of products (Normal value х4=0)

x5-risk ratio (Normal value 0.7)

х5=29145(section 5)/1429512(section 3)=0.02

х6 - asset utilization factor (Standard value х6=value х6 per last year)

Last year х6=1458615/1087463=1.34

Z> Zн, so the probability of bankruptcy of the enterprise is very high

Based on the values obtained after calculating the probability of bankruptcy using the two-factor and five-factor Altman models, the four-factor models of Taffler and Lees, we can conclude that for several years the risks of bankruptcy of the enterprise are low. And according to the Russian model Zaitseva, the probability of bankruptcy is extremely high. The most accurate model of the probability of bankruptcy is the Altman five-factor model, according to its result, one can see that the enterprise is stable and financially stable.

Keywords

FINANCIAL POTENTIAL/ FINANCIAL POTENTIAL / INTEGRAL EVALUATION/INTEGRAL ESTIMATE/ GRAPHIC ANALYSIS/ GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS / OIL AND GAS COMPANIES/ OIL AND GAS COMPANY

annotation scientific article on economics and business, author of scientific work - Aliev A.A., Solovieva M.G., Kachalina A.D.

Thing. A set of theoretical, practical and methodological issues related to determining the financial condition of enterprises, based on the use of the group relative indicators companies. Goals. Getting a generalized integral assessment financial capacity companies in the oil and gas industry and the construction of a graphical model for a visual representation of the results of calculations. Methodology. Tools used graphical analysis, the theory of fuzzy sets and the Cartesian coordinate system for calculating general integral indicators characterizing the assessment of the company's financial condition. Results. The results of assigning ranks to each of the indicators are determined by calculating the corresponding weight coefficients based on the Fishburn criterion. Initial and normalized indicators are selected, vector values are formed on the basis of this. Developed integral assessment the financial position of companies and built a graphical model that reflects the position of the assessment. The zones corresponding to the financial condition of the company at a certain point in time are determined. Scope of the results. The methodology will be of interest to top management and investment companies focused on the oil and gas industry for comparative financial analysis of companies. The use of an integral indicator allows us to present generalized estimates. Findings. The main indicators for assessing the financial condition of an enterprise were identified by forming an integral indicator, and a graphical modeling of the results obtained, reflecting the financial condition of companies, was carried out.

Integral Estimation of the Company""s Financial Condition

Subject This paper considers the theoretical, practical and methodological issues related to the definition of the financial condition of enterprises, based on the use of a set of relative indicators of companies. Objectives The paper aims to obtain a generalized integral assessment of the financial potential of oil and gas companies and build a graphical model for visual presentation of the results of calculations. Methods For the study, we used tools of graphical analysis , fuzzy set theory and Cartesian coordinate system for calculating common integrated indicators. Results The paper presents a developed technique of integral estimation of the financial position of the companies and a graphic model reflecting the received estimation position. It defines zones that correspond to the company's financial situation at a particular point in time. Relevance The results obtained can be used in financial analysis of companies, as well as in the educational course on financial disciplines. The methodology offered can be of interest to top management and investment companies focused on the oil and gas industry, as well as during the comparative analysis of companies for scientific and educational purposes.

The text of the scientific work on the topic "Integral assessment of the financial condition of the enterprise"

pISSN 2071-4688 Financial capital

INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF THE FINANCIAL STATE OF THE ENTERPRISE

Ayaz Aladdin oglu ALIEV3", Maria Gennadievna SOLOVIEVA*, Anastasia Dmitrievna KACHALINAs

a Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Financial Management,

Russian Economic University. G.V. Plekhanov, Moscow, the Russian Federation

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0003-1476-9702

SPIN: 8015-2460

student, Russian University of Economics. G.V. Plekhanov, Moscow, Russian Federation

[email protected]

ORCID: none

SPIN code: none

c Student, Russian University of Economics. G.V. Plekhanov, Moscow, Russian Federation

[email protected]

ORCID: none

SPIN code: none

Article History: Annotation

Received 01/12/2018 Subject. A set of theoretical, practical and methodological issues,

Obtained in a modified form related to the determination of the financial condition of enterprises, based on the form of 01/26/2018 using a group of relative indicators of companies.

Approved 02/09/2018 Purposes. Obtaining a generalized integral assessment of financial potential

Available online 27.02.2018 oil and gas companies and building a graphical model for visual

presentation of calculation results.

Methodology. The tools of graphical analysis, the theory of fuzzy sets and the Cartesian coordinate system were used to calculate general integral indicators characterizing the assessment of the company's financial condition. Results. The results of assigning ranks to each of the indicators are determined by calculating the corresponding weight coefficients based on the Fishburn criterion. Initial and normalized indicators are selected, vector values are formed on the basis of this. An integral assessment of the financial position of companies has been developed and a graphical model has been built that reflects the position of the obtained assessment. The zones corresponding to the financial condition of the company at a certain point in time are determined.

Scope of the results. The methodology will be of interest to top management and investment companies focused on the oil and gas industry for comparative financial analysis of companies. The use of an integral indicator allows us to present generalized estimates.

Findings. The main indicators for assessing the financial condition of an enterprise were identified by forming an integral indicator, and a graphical modeling of the results obtained, reflecting the financial condition of companies, was carried out.

For citation: Aliev A.A., Solovieva M.G., Kachalina A.D. Integral assessment financial state of the enterprise // Finance and credit. - 2018. - V. 24, No. 2. - S. 288 - 303. https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.24.2.288

The financial condition is a complex placement of funds, real and potential concepts and is characterized by a system of financial capabilities of the enterprise and indicators that reflect the availability and effectiveness of their use.

UDC 336.64 JEL: G32, G34

Keywords:

financial potential, integrated assessment, graphical analysis, oil and gas companies

The relevance of the issue largely led to the development of various methods for analyzing the financial condition of enterprises, which are aimed at preparing information for the purpose of making managerial decisions, assessing the financial condition and developing a strategy for managing the financial condition of enterprises.

Based on the analysis of scientific literature on the problem of assessing the financial condition of companies, a system of relative indicators has been formed. This system will allow developing a methodology for an integral assessment of the financial condition on the example of oil and gas companies.

The criteria for assessing the financial condition of companies identified during the critical analysis are based on indicators of financial stability, liquidity and profitability of enterprises (Table 1).

The method of integral assessment of the financial condition of companies involves taking into account the shortcomings of existing approaches and methods of assessment. At the same time, the system is not only based on an industry assessment, but should also take into account the assessment of individual aggregated groups of indicators of the financial and economic condition of enterprises.

In addition, for an integral assessment of the financial condition of companies, three groups of indicators were used: the profitability of the company, financial liquidity and financial stability.

In a number of scientific papers there are comments on the fundamental importance in assessing the financial condition of a company of profitability indicators. To assess the profitability of assets and sources of capital, the following indicators are used:

Return on sales ratio (ROS) - characterizes the amount of profit that falls on the unit products sold ;

Return on assets ratio (return on total capital, total profitability of the enterprise) (ROA) - reflects the results of operations

enterprise, allows you to assess the ability of assets to generate profit, regardless of the sources of raising funds and indicates the level of competitiveness of the company;

The return on equity ratio (financial profitability) (ROE) - shows how efficiently the company uses its own capital or the income it receives on the monetary unit of its own funds.

In his works, E.A. Markaryan, G.P. Gerasimenko, in order to assess the liquidity of the company, three main indicators are used:

Absolute (instantaneous) liquidity ratio - shows that part of the current debt that the company can repay on the balance sheet date at the moment or in the very near future. Standard value - 0.2 - 0.5;

Critical liquidity ratio - characterizes the part of the company's short-term liabilities, which can be repaid not only at the expense of cash and short-term financial investments, but also at the expense of expected receipts for the services rendered. Standard value - 0.7 - 1;

Current liquidity ratio (general coverage ratio) - reflects the current financial condition of the organization and allows you to assess the adequacy of working capital that can be used to pay off its short-term liabilities, that is, to what extent current liabilities are secured by similar assets of the organization. Standard value - 1-2.

The third group of indicators includes indicators of the company's financial stability. In the works of A.O. Nedosekin argues that the following indicators have the greatest weight in the system for assessing the financial condition of an enterprise:

The coefficient of autonomy (financial independence) - characterizes the degree of formation of the assets of the enterprise due to

own funds, reflects the level of independence from external sources of financing activities. Standard value - 0.7;

Investment coverage ratio - shows the share of the company's property, covered by long-term sources of its financing. Standard value - 0.75 - 0.9;

The interest coverage ratio shows the amount of security of interest paid on loans and credits by the received profit. The standard value is greater than 1.

The asset structure of companies in the oil refining industry is focused on non-current assets, as a result of which they have lower liquidity and provide a sufficient level of profitability.

Financial profitability. As mentioned earlier, profitability ratios are of great importance. But the most important is the profitability of sales, as it allows you to correctly interpret the turnover data. Useful for economic forecasts in conditions of limited market size, holding back sales growth.

Based on the calculation of the investment coverage ratio and autonomy, it makes sense to use indicators of return on assets and equity, including to reflect the efficiency of using the assets of these companies and generating revenue, which together implies a higher rank of return on assets.

financial liquidity. To compile the model, three indicators of liquidity are used, which is associated with the need to introduce liquidity restrictions as it decreases, as well as to use an integral assessment in the model with the identification of areas corresponding to different financial conditions of the company at a certain point in time.

Due to the predominance of non-current assets in the balance sheet structure of companies

of the sector under consideration, it makes sense to distribute the ranks of financial liquidity indicators in the order corresponding to the increase in liquidity. Normative values of financial liquidity have a bilateral limitation, which implies their limited use within the framework of the generalized indicator.

AT oil industry the need for a constant availability of highly liquid assets is not a paramount task, unlike a number of other industries.

Financial stability. In this group, ranks occupy their position for a number of reasons. Oil production activities require large investments for the implementation of one project, on the basis of which it is important to take into account the share of funds attributable to interest payments from operating profit.

The next value is the investment coverage ratio, which includes an assessment of liquidity and allows the investor to assess the situation in the company when its own assets are low liquidity, financing of any investment project will seem risky to the investor and with a high degree of probability he will abandon this project.

The third indicator included in this group is the coefficient of autonomy, as it is the most common. At the same time, the ratio of equity to assets is not sufficiently informative, since companies in the oil refining industry in the balance sheet attach great importance to assets, and it is non-current, which is associated with the presence of a large number of pipelines, oil production and processing equipment. Financial stability gives an assessment of the solvency of the enterprise, but in the case of unprofitable financial activity, this indicator loses its relevance.

Based on the above parameters, the main indicators were distinguished in descending order of their weight in the assessment system, as well as

the allocation of ranks from 1 to 3 within each group of financial indicators, which together characterize the financial condition of enterprises, was carried out. The results of the ranking of indicators are presented in Table. 2.

The proposal to use the method of expert assessment, which consists in highlighting the most and least priority indicators of companies, is due to the lack of a developed mechanism for differentiating indicators based on a scientific basis.

In the absence of a specific quantitative assessment of the significance of indicators, it makes sense to use the tools used in other scientific disciplines, one of which is the ranking of criteria according to the Fishburne rule.

The main provisions state that the only known information about the ratio of the significance of indicators is the following ratio:

r1 > r1 + 1 > r1+2, (1)

where i - coefficient rank or serial number after ranking;

Г - the significance of each criterion or the degree of its manifestation.

This provision makes it possible to reveal the sequence of relations of the indicators under consideration in relation to each other. The quantitative characteristic of the r "th criterion is determined by the following formula:

where N is the total number of ranks.

Necessary condition normalization of specific gravity is:

In order to develop a methodology for an integral assessment of the state of companies, it is proposed to

consideration of three groups of indicators. This system, on the one hand, answers the question of what is the current financial potential of the company, on the other hand, it includes the most significant financial indicators of the state of the enterprise, which together makes it possible to ensure the complexity and completeness of the assessment of the financial condition at a certain point in time.

By applying the ratio (1) on the example of the identified indicators, the results of the ranking of the coefficients and their weight values were determined (Table 3).

Based on the obtained values of the specific weights for each of the assigned ranks, the values of the integral indicator1 were calculated for each individual time period in the period 2014-2016. for companies in the oil and gas sector, namely British Petroleum and Rosneft (Table 4).

As a result of the calculations, three indicators were obtained for each company for 2014-2016. (Table 5).

As a result of the calculations, the values of the integral indicator were revealed, taking into account the weights according to the Fishburne method. In order to graphically display the assessment of the financial condition of the company, the Cartesian coordinate system is selected. On the abscissa axis, the data obtained by the integral assessment are plotted; on the y-axis - the estimate obtained without taking into account the weights.

In order to build the model, values are calculated by groups of indicators without taking into account specific gravity according to the Fishburn method (Table 6).

To determine the areas that characterize the financial condition, it is necessary to evaluate the standard values, taking into account the specific weight and without it. Data for determining areas are given in table. 7 and 8.

Based on the obtained values, areas were formed, at the intersection of which a zone of absolute stability is formed (Fig. 1)

1 Data from the annual financial statements for 2014-2016 British Petroleum. Data from the annual financial statements for 2014-2016 PJSC Rosneft.

As a result of the analysis, four zones were identified that reflect the financial condition of the company. The first zone has an interval along the abscissa axis: , along the ordinate axis: . The following zones were obtained by parallel transfer:

1) green - absolutely stable financial condition;

2) yellow - normal financial condition;

3) gray - zone of uncertainty;

4) red - critical state zone.

Based on the data obtained, a model for an integral assessment of the financial condition of BP and Rosneft companies was built, which is graphically presented in Fig. 2.

According to the results of the assessment of the financial condition of companies for 2014-2016. revealed:

For the Rosneft company, it can be noted that the integral indicator entered the zone of absolute stability in 2014 and 2015. due to high profitability and interest coverage ratios, as well as normal financial stability in 2016;

The integral indicator for British Petroleum in the periods under review falls into three different zones. The most critical state was observed in 2015; according to the results of 2016, the integral indicator is located in the intermediate zone.

Table 1

Systems of indicators for assessing the financial condition of companies

Indicator systems to assess the financial status of companies

Components of the assessment system Financial Indicators

states

Financial profitability Sales profitability ratio

Return on assets ratio

Return on equity ratio

Financial liquidity Absolute liquidity ratio

Critical liquidity ratio

Current liquidity ratio

Financial stability Autonomy ratio

Investment coverage ratio

Interest coverage ratio

table 2

The system of indicators for assessing the financial condition of oil and gas companies and their rank within each group

The indicator system to assess the financial status of oil and gas companies and their rank within each group

Components of the assessment system Rank Indicators Rank

financial condition

Financial profitability 1 Return on sales ratio 1

Return on assets 2

Profitability ratio of own 3

capital

Financial liquidity 3 Absolute liquidity ratio 3

Critical liquidity ratio 2

Current liquidity ratio 1

Financial stability 2 Autonomy ratio 3

Investment coverage ratio 2

Interest coverage ratio 1

Table 3

Coefficient ranking and weighting results

The results of ranking of ratios and assignment of weights

System of indicators Indicators that make up Rank Specific Rank Specific

assessment of the financial system assessment of the financial as a whole weight by inside weight by

company states company states Fishburne rule (r) groups Fishburne rule (r)

Profitability ROS 1 0.5 1 0.5

Financial Autonomy ratio 2 0.167 3 0.167

sustainability Investment coverage ratio 2 0.333

Interest coverage ratio 1 0.5

Financial Ratio absolute 3 0.333 3 0.167

liquidity liquidity

Critical factor 2 0.333

liquidity

Current liquidity ratio 1 0.5

Source: Authoring

Table 4

Calculation of BP and Rosneft indicators based on the use of specific weight according to the Fishburne rule

Calculation of the BP and Rosneft parameters through specific weights according to Fishburn's rule

Indicator Rank Weight 2014 Intp. 2015 Intp. 2016 Intp.

Rosneft

ROS 1 0.5 0.108 0.05 0.137 0.069 0.133 0.066

ROA2 0.33 0.074 0.03 0.078 0.026 0.065 0.022

ROE 3 0.17 0.116 0.02 0.123 0.02 0.06 0.01

Profitability - - - 0.1 - 0.115 - 0.098

Kal (absolute liquidity) 3 0.17 0.463 0.08 0.851 0.142 0.447 0.074

Kcl (critical liquidity) 2 0.33 0.855 0.28 1.123 0.374 0.668 0.223

Ktl (current liquidity) 1 0.5 1.049 0.53 1.323 0.662 0.829 0.415

Liquidity - - - 0.89 - 1.178 - 0.712

Ka (autonomies) 3 0.17 0.33 0.06 0.309 0.051 0.338 0.056

CPI (investment coverage) 2 0.33 0.768 0.26 0.818 0.273 0.749 0.25

CPP (interest coverage) 1 0.5 6.494 3.25 4.046 2.023 2.791 1.395

Stability - - - 3.56 - 2.347 - 1.701

Profitability 1 0.5 0.098 0.05 0.115 0.058 0.098 0.049

Liquidity 2 0.17 0.887 0.15 1.178 0.196 0.712 0.119

Stability 3 0.33 3.558 1.19 2.347 0.782 1.701 0.567

Total value - - - 1.38 - 1.036 - 0.735

ROS 1 0.5 0.002 0.01 -0.047 -0.023 -0.016 -0.008

ROA 2 0.33 0.003 0.01 -0.038 -0.013 -0.011 -0.004

ROE 3 0.17 0.033 0.01 -0.061 -0.01 0.002 0

Profitability - - - 0.01 - -0.046 - -0.011

Kal (absolute liquidity) 2 0.33 0.554 0.18 0.564 0.188 0.455 0.152

Kcl (critical liquidity) 1 0.5 1.083 0.54 1.021 0.511 0.86 0.43

Ktl (current liquidity) 3 0.17 1.372 0.23 1.28 0.213 1.162 0.194

Liquidity - - - 0.95 - 0.912 - 0.775

Ka (autonomies) 3 0.17 0.396 0.07 0.376 0.063 0.368 0.061

CPI (investment coverage) 2 0.33 0.776 0.26 0.791 0.264 0.778 0.259

CPP (interest coverage) 1 0.5 2.301 1.15 -4.78 -2.39 -0.509 -0.254

Stability - - - 1.48 - -2.064 - 0.066

Profitability 1 0.5 0.008 0.01 -0.046 -0.023 -0.011 -0.006

Liquidity 3 0.17 0.955 0.16 0.912 0.152 0.775 0.129

Stability 2 0.33 1.475 0.49 -2.064 -0.688 0.066 0.022

Total value - - - 0.65 - -0.559 - 0.146

JSC "Arsenal" (EXAMPLE)

as of 01.01.2015

Taking into account the variety of financial processes, the plurality of indicators of financial stability, the difference in the level of their critical assessments, the emerging degree of deviation from them of the actual values of the coefficients and the resulting difficulties in the overall assessment of the financial stability of enterprises, an integral scoring is carried out.

The essence of the methodology lies in the classification of enterprises according to the level of risk, i.e. any analyzed enterprise can be assigned to a certain class, depending on the "scored" number of points, based on the actual values of financial stability indicators.

Criteria for assessing indicators of the financial stability of an enterprise

No. p.p.	Indicators financial condition	Ratings Bye- contributors	C R I T E R I I
No. p.p.	Indicators financial condition	Ratings Bye- contributors	higher	lower	Decrease Conditions criteria
1	Absolute liquidity ratio (L2)	20	0.5 and above - 20 points	less than 0.1 - 0 points	For every 0.1 points reduction compared to from 0.5, removed by 4 points
2	Critical coefficient grades (P3)	18	1.5 and above - 18 points	less than 1.0 - 0 points	For every 0.1 points reduction compared to from 1.5, removed by 3 points
3	current coefficient liquidity (L4)	16,5	2.0 and above - 16.5 points	less than 1.0 - 0 points	For every 0.1 points reduction compared to from 2.0, removed by 1.5 points
4	Financial independence (U12)	17	0.6 and above - 17 points	less than 0.4 - 0 points	For every 0.01 points reduction compared to from 0.6, removed by 0.8 points
5	Security ratio own sources of financing (U1)	15	0.5 and above - 15 points	less than 0.1 - 0 points	For every 0.1 points reduction compared to from 0.5, removed by 3 points
6	Financial independence in terms of stock formation and costs (U24)	13,5	1.0 and above - 13.5 points	less than 0.5 - 0 points	For every 0.1 points reduction compared to from 1.0, removed by 2.5 points
Total:		100,0	100,0	0

Classification of financial stability by the amount of points

The number of points scored characterizing financial stability

Indicators financial condition	01.01.2014		01.01.2015
Indicators financial condition	Actual values	Number of points	Actual values	Number of points
1. Absolute liquidity ratio (L2)	0.233	9.32	0.413	16.52
2. Coefficient of critical evaluation (P3)	0.239	0	0.429	0
3. Current liquidity ratio (L4)	1.387	7.31	2.202	16.5
4. Financial independence ratio (U12)	0.43	3.4	0.601	17
5. Coefficient of provision with own sources of financing (U1)	124.245	15	124.459	15
6. The coefficient of financial independence in terms of the formation of reserves and costs (U24)	0.943	12.08	1.474	13.5
		47.11		78.52

At the beginning of the period: 01/01/2014: 4th class of financial stability

The company has a satisfactory financial condition close to bankruptcy. The risk of partner relationships with this enterprise is very significant.

At the end of the period: 01/01/2015: 2nd class of financial stability

The company is in good financial condition. There is an insignificant level of risk in the relationship of partners with this enterprise.

When summarizing the results of the conducted analytical calculations, it is sometimes difficult to give a general assessment of the level of stability of the financial condition. This is due to the fact that it is recommended to use and use many indicators to characterize it, some of which were discussed above. For many indicators, there are no standard values or there are differences in the level of recommended standards. In addition, the analysis reveals multidirectional dynamics of individual indicators and deviations of their actual values from established standards.

To overcome these difficulties, it is possible to apply the methodology of the integral assessment of the financial condition 1 , which reduces the multi-criteria method of assessing the financial condition to a single-criteria one.

AT practical work the method of integral scoring of the degree of stability of the financial condition can be used, which is based on the ranking of organizations (assignment to one of the five classes) according to the level of risk of relationships with them associated with the loss of money or their incomplete return. At the same time, organizations assigned to a certain class are characterized by their stability as follows:

I class - organizations with high financial stability. Their financial condition allows you to be sure of the timely and complete fulfillment of all obligations with a sufficient margin in case possible error in management.

Class II - organizations with good financial condition. Their financial stability as a whole is close to optimal, but some lag is allowed for certain coefficients. There is practically no risk in dealing with such organizations.

Class III - organizations whose financial condition can be assessed as satisfactory. The analysis revealed the weakness of individual coefficients. In relations with such organizations, there is hardly a threat of losing the funds themselves, but the fulfillment of obligations on time seems doubtful.

Class IV - organizations with an unstable financial condition. They have an unsatisfactory capital structure, and solvency (liquidity) is at the lower limit of acceptable values. They belong to the organizations of special attention, tk. in dealing with them there is a certain risk of loss of funds.

Class V - organizations with a financial crisis, practically insolvent. Relationships with them are extremely risky.

The constituent elements of the proposed methodology for the integral scoring of financial stability are:

The system of basic coefficients (K 1? K 2, K 3, K 4, K5, K5, the content and calculation method of which were discussed above), characterizing the financial condition of the organization;

Rating of coefficients in points, characterizing their significance in assessing the financial condition, the upper and lower limits of their values and the order of transition from upper to lower limits, necessary to classify the organization as a certain class (rating, boundaries and order of transition are established by expert opinion) - table. 12.15. The definition of the class of organizations according to the level of values of indicators of financial condition is given in Table. 12.16.

Based on the table 12.16 and the actual values of the coefficients calculated in 12.5 and 12.6 in Table. 12.17 an integral assessment of the stability of the financial condition was made. She showed that if at the beginning of the year an organization whose accounting form No. 1 is given in Table. 12.1, can be attributed with some stretch only to class III, then the increase in the level of coefficients brought it closer to class II at the end of the reporting period. Calculations based on the revised indicators make it possible to fairly confidently attribute the organization to class II, i.e. to the class of organizations with financial stability close to optimal, in relations with which there is practically no risk.

Of interest are other methods of rating assessment, different from the ones discussed above, proposed by V.V. Kovalev and O.N. Volkova, as well as A.D. Sheremet, R.S. Saifu-lin and E.V. Negashev.

It should be noted that the need to assess the financial stability of organizations when determining the possibility of issuing loans to them has led to the development by almost every commercial bank of its own methodology for the integral assessment of the borrower's creditworthiness 1 .

This assessment is based on:

Indicators selected by the bank that most fully characterize, in his opinion, the financial condition of the organization (in addition to traditional indicators, profitability is usually included in the composition of indicators);

Calculation of the actual values of these indicators according to the method adopted by the bank and comparing them with the criterion level established by it for each class of the borrowing organization. At the same time, the criteria levels are usually set differentially by sectors of the national economy;

Determining the number of points for each indicator and the total amount of points that allows the organization to be attributed, as a rule, to one of the five creditworthiness classes, which is understood as the client's ability to pay off his obligations to the bank in a timely and complete manner.

Basically, the characteristics of the creditworthiness of organizations belonging to each of the five classes are identical for banks:

The 1st class includes clients with a very stable financial position. The loans they provide have a low degree of credit risk;

Table 12.17

integral assessment of financial stability

organizations

No. p / p	Financial stability indicators	At the beginning of the reporting year	At the end of the reporting period
actual value	number of points	actual value	number of points
		0,23		0,99
	Quick (urgent) liquidity ratio (k5)	1,04		1,14
	Current liquidity ratio (K 6)	1,52		1,92
		0,60		0,74
		0,34		0,47
	Financial independence ratio in terms of reserves (k3)	1,26	13,5	1,31	13,5
	Total	X	50,5	X	71,5
updated financial stability indicators
	Absolute liquidity ratio (K 4)	0,37		1,19
	Quick (urgent) liquidity ratio (k5)	1,49		1,23
	Current ratio (Kg)	1,62		1,97	1,5
	Overall Financial Independence Ratio (Kj)	0,65		0,76
	Financial independence ratio in terms of current assets (K 2)	0,42		0,52
	Financial independence ratio in terms of reserves (K 3)	1,55	13,5	1,44	13,5
	Total	X	76,5	X	76,0

The 2nd class includes clients with a fairly stable financial position. The loans provided by them have a low degree of credit risk, subject to a sufficiently high category of corporateness. With a low category of corporateness, loans have a normal (permissible) degree of credit risk;

The 3rd class includes clients with a fairly stable financial position. The loans provided by him have a normal (permissible) degree of credit risk, and under the condition of a high category of corporatism - low;

The 4th class includes clients with a satisfactory financial situation. The loans provided by him have a normal (permissible) degree of credit risk, subject to a high category of corporatism or sufficiency of collateral;

The 5th class includes clients who are granted loans with a normal (permissible) degree of credit risk, subject to a high category of corporateness and sufficiency of collateral. It should be noted that in almost all commercial banks, a client who does not conduct financial and economic activities or does not carry out it for more than six months (in the absence of cash flow on settlement accounts) belongs to the 5th class of creditworthiness.

Consideration of banking methods for the integral assessment of the financial condition (creditworthiness) of organizations showed that, despite the general principles of their construction, they differ both in the system of indicators, and in the procedure for calculating essentially identical indicators, and in criteria boundaries, and rating values.

In connection with the above, important methodological tasks in the field of increasing the objectivity of the integral assessment of the stability of the financial condition are the development of an optimal system of indicators, a reasonable methodology for their calculation, as well as the establishment of their standard values, differentiated by individual industries and based on the values that have developed in the industry and take into account the regulatory (normal) their values in countries with developed market economy. A serious attempt in this direction was made by the Ministry of Economy of Russia, which approved by its order of October 1, 1997 No. 118 Methodological recommendations for the reform of enterprises (organizations).

However, these Methodological Recommendations lack a unified terminology regarding the designation of indicators, contain many criteria, do not provide the calculation procedure and standards for many of them, and the methodology itself is cumbersome and logically incomplete, i.e. this document does not give specific recommendations for determining the average integral assessment, which makes it extremely difficult to carry out analytical work in practice.

It should be noted that the methods for assessing potential bankruptcy considered in 12.9 are, in fact, also methods for an integral assessment of the financial condition of an organization.

In conclusion, it should be noted that currently:

First, in publications and official documents there is no unity in the definition basic concepts related to financial condition;

Secondly, the recommendations of specialists in the field of financial analysis are very diverse both in terms of the system of indicators used and in the terminology used, and the instructions (recommendations) of the executive authorities are not sufficiently systematic and are not coordinated with each other;

Thirdly, the possibilities of external and internal analysis largely determined by analytical information, constantly changing and improving;

Fourthly, the analysis of the financial condition is a rather complex creative work that requires knowledge of the methods of express assessments, external and internal analysis, operational and in-depth studies, the ability to select from a variety of randomly offered necessary minimum indicators, give them a systematic sound, reasonably apply the standards, correctly assess dynamic changes, perform factor analysis, etc.

The foregoing indicates that the methodology for analyzing the financial condition requires constant further reflection and improvement.

test questions

1. What are the main tasks and directions of the analysis of the financial condition?

2.What methods are used to analyze the financial condition?

3. What is the composition and content of financial statements, including each section of the sample of its forms?

4. What regulatory framework determines the content of the balance sheet items?

5. What is the composition of the system of main indicators for assessing the financial condition?

6. What is the essence of the express analysis of the financial condition?

7. What is financial independence and what is the system of absolute and relative indicators characterizing it? What is the method of their calculation?

8. What are the criteria for assessing financial independence?

9.What is solvency and liquidity and how do they differ? What indicators are they characterized by and what is the methodology for calculating these indicators?

10. What is net assets And what is the method of their calculation?

11.What is meant by cash flows and what is the purpose of their analysis?

12. What factors determine the amount of the final cash balance?

13. What indicators are used to assess the potential bankruptcy of an organization?

14. What is the factor-by-factor mechanism for the formation of retained earnings, reflected in the form No. 1 of financial statements?

15. What is the procedure for calculating net profit in the form No. 2 of financial statements?

16. What elements does borrowed capital consist of and under what condition is its attraction effective?

17. What is the essence of calculating the effect of financial leverage?

18. What is the composition of accounts receivable and what factors affect its value?

19. What is the composition of external and internal accounts payable and what indicators are used in its analysis?

20. What is meant by the current financial needs of the organization?

21. What are the main stages in the analysis of the state of settlements with the budget?

22. What is the purpose of factor analysis of tax payments?

24. What is the system of indicators of the effectiveness of the use of current assets?

25. For what purpose is an integral assessment of the stability of the financial condition?

26. What determines the credit relationship between banks and organizations?

SH Literature

1. Abryutina M.S., Granee A.V. Analysis of the financial and economic activity of the enterprise. Moscow: Delo i Service, 1998.

2.Analysis economic activity in industry / Ed. IN AND. Strazhev. Minsk: Higher School, 2000.

3. Artemenko V.G., Bellendir M.V. Financial analysis: Proc. allowance. M.: DIS, 1997.

4. Balabanov I.T. Financial analysis and planning of an economic entity. 2nd ed. M.: Finance and statistics, 2002.

5. Bernstein L.A. Analysis of financial statements: Theory, practice and interpretation: Per. from English. M.: Finance and statistics, 1996.

6. Blank I.A. Financial management: Proc. well. Kyiv: Nika-Center Elga, 1999.

7.Brigham Yu., Gapensky L. Financial management: TRANS. from English / Ed. V.V. Kovalev. SPb., 1997.

8. Bykadorov V.L., Alekseev P.D. Financial and economic state of the enterprise: Practical. allowance. M.: PRIOR, 2002.

9. Dontsova L.V., Nikiforova N.A. Annual and quarterly financial statements: Educational method, compilation guide. Moscow: Delo i Service, 1998.

10. Dontsova L.V., Nikiforova N.A. Comprehensive analysis of financial statements. Moscow: Business and Service, 2001.

11. Ermolovich L.L. Analysis of the financial and economic activities of the enterprise. Minsk: Ed. BSEU, 2001.

12. Efimova O.V. The financial analysis. M.: Accounting, 2002.

13. Karlin T.R. Analysis financial statements(based on GAAP): Tutorial. M.: INFRA-M, 1998.

14. Kovalev V.V. The financial analysis. M.: Finance and statistics, 1996.

15. Kovalev V.V., Volkova O.N. Analysis of the economic activity of the enterprise. M.: Prospekt, 2002.

16. Kravchenko L.I. Analysis of economic activity in trade. Minsk: Higher School, 2000.

17. Kreinina M.N. Financial management. Moscow: Delo i Service, 1998.

18. Lyubushin N.P., Leshcheva V.B., Dyakova V.G. Analysis of the financial and economic activities of the enterprise: Proc. allowance / Ed. N.P. Lyubushin. M.: UNITI-DANA, 2001.

19. Rodionova M.V., Fedotova M.A. Financial stability of the enterprise in the conditions of inflation. M.: Prospect, 1995.

20. Savitskaya G.V. Analysis of the economic activity of the enterprise. Minsk: LLC "New Knowledge", 2002.

21. Selezneva N.N., Ionova A.F. The financial analysis. M.: UNITI, 2001.

22. Sheremet A.D., Saifulin R.S. Enterprise finance. M.: INFRA-M, 1999.

23. Sheremet A.D., Saifulin R.S., Negashev E.V. Methods of financial analysis. M.: INFRA-M, 2002.

24. Richard J. Audit and analysis of economic activity of the enterprise. M.: Audit, UNITI, 1997.

25. Financial management: Theory and practice: Textbook / Ed. E.S. Stoyanova. M.: Prospect, 1999.

26.Altman El. Financial Ratios, Discriminat Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy // Journal of Financt. Sept. 1968. P. 589-609.

Introduction. 3

1. Theoretical foundations of the analysis of the financial stability of the enterprise. 4

1.1 The concept of financial stability of the enterprise. 4

1.2 Methods for analyzing the financial stability of the enterprise. eight

2. Integral assessment of the financial stability of the enterprise. eleven

3. Using an integral score to ensure the repayment of a loan 16

Conclusion. 23

References:24

Introduction

AT modern conditions The main tasks of economic development are to increase the efficiency of production, as well as to take a stable position of enterprises in the domestic and international markets. Under market conditions, the financial and economic activity of the enterprise is carried out at the expense of self-financing, and with a lack of own financial resources, at the expense of borrowed funds. Therefore, it is necessary to know what is the financial independence of the enterprise from borrowed capital and what is the financial stability of the enterprise.

The degree of financial stability of an enterprise is of interest to investors and creditors, since on the basis of its assessment they make decisions about investing in an enterprise, therefore, the issues of managing the financial stability of an enterprise are very relevant for an enterprise.

A necessary prerequisite for making the right management decision is objective and timely information about the current state of affairs at the enterprise, which can only be obtained as a result of a financial analysis that assesses the financial stability of an economic entity. Without these data, decisions made by management personnel will be inadequate to the current situation and, in the worst case, may lead the enterprise to bankruptcy.

In the light of the foregoing, at present in Russia the problem of assessing the sustainability of the financial condition of an enterprise is extremely relevant, both for the management of the enterprise itself and for various government departments that control the activities of economic entities.

The purpose of this work is to analyze the concept of an integral assessment of the financial stability of an enterprise.

1. Theoretical foundations for analyzing the financial stability of an enterprise

1.1 The concept of financial stability of the enterprise

The financial condition of an enterprise (FSP) is characterized by a system of indicators that reflect the state of capital in the process of its circulation and the ability of a business entity to finance its activities at a fixed point in time.

In the process of supply, production, marketing and financial activities, there is a continuous process of capital circulation, the structure of funds and sources of their formation, the availability and need for financial resources and, as a result, the financial condition of the enterprise, the external manifestation of which is solvency, are changing.

The financial condition can be stable, unstable (pre-crisis) and crisis. The ability of an enterprise to make payments on time, finance its activities on an expanded basis, withstand unforeseen shocks and maintain its solvency in adverse circumstances indicates its financial stability.

m state, and vice versa.

If solvency is an external manifestation of the financial condition of an enterprise, then financial stability is its internal side, reflecting the balance of cash and commodity flows, income and expenses, funds and sources of their formation (Fig. 1).

The financial stability of an enterprise is such a state of its financial resources, their distribution and use, which ensures the development of an enterprise based on the growth of profits and capital while maintaining solvency and creditworthiness under conditions of an acceptable level of risk.

The financial autonomy of an enterprise is a special case of its financial stability and characterizes the level of financial independence of an enterprise from creditors. The level of financial autonomy of an enterprise is determined by the structure of its capital. The larger the share of the company's own capital, the higher the level of its financial autonomy.

Financial stability of the enterprise

Fig 1. The basic concept of the financial stability of an enterprise

Financial stability of the enterprise - this is the ability of a business entity to function and develop, to maintain a balance of its assets and liabilities in a changing internal and external environment, which guarantees its constant solvency and investment attractiveness within the limits of an acceptable level of risk.

A stable financial condition is achieved with equity capital adequacy, good asset quality, a sufficient level of profitability, taking into account operational and financial risk, liquidity adequacy, stable income and wide opportunities to attract borrowed funds.

To ensure financial stability, an enterprise must have a flexible capital structure (that is, have a high level of financial autonomy), be able to organize its movement in such a way as to ensure a constant excess of income over expenses in order to maintain solvency and create conditions for self-reproduction.

The financial condition of the enterprise, its sustainability and stability depend on the results of its production, commercial and financial activities. If production and financial plans are successfully implemented, it has a positive effect on financial position enterprises. Conversely, as a result of underfulfillment of the plan for the production and sale of products, there is an increase in its cost, a decrease in revenue and the amount of profit and, as a result, a deterioration in the financial condition of the enterprise and its solvency. Consequently, a stable financial condition is not a fluke, but the result of a competent, skillful management of the entire complex of factors that determine the results of an enterprise's economic activity.

A stable financial position, in turn, has a positive impact on the performance production plans and providing the needs of production with the necessary resources. So financial activities as an integral part of economic activity, it should be aimed at ensuring the planned receipt and expenditure of financial resources, the implementation of settlement discipline, the achievement of rational proportions of equity and borrowed capital and its most efficient use.

In changing environmental conditions, it is the result of skillful, calculated management of the entire set of production and economic factors that determine the results of the enterprise (Fig. 2).

Rice. 2 Factors affecting the financial condition of the enterprise

To ensure the required level of financial stability, the management system of an enterprise must actively respond to changes in external and internal factors.

For management to be effective, the financial condition must be constantly assessed. Determining the financial condition on a particular date answers the question: how correctly did the company manage its resources during the period preceding this date?

An analysis of the stability of the financial condition is a set of methods that make it possible to determine the state of affairs of an enterprise as a result of studying the results of its activities.

The study of the financial condition should give the management of the enterprise a picture of its actual financial condition.

It should be noted here that information about the past and present financial condition is useful only to the extent that it affects the future state of affairs.

The purpose of the financial stability analysis is not only to establish and evaluate the financial condition, but also to constantly work to improve it. The analysis shows in what directions this work should be carried out, makes it possible to identify the most important aspects and the weakest sides. The results of the analysis provide an answer to the question possible ways improvement of the financial condition in a specific period of its activity.

Therefore, in modern Russian conditions of particular importance is the serious analytical work at the enterprise, associated with the study and forecasting of its financial condition. Timely and complete identification of the "pain points" of the company's finances allows you to implement a set of measures to prevent bankruptcy.

1.2 Methods for analyzing the financial stability of an enterprise

The method of analysis is understood as a set of techniques and methods for studying an economic phenomenon. The methods of analysis are: 1) induction, deduction; 2) detailing; 3) systematization; 4) generalization.

The way to study causal relationships with the help of logical induction is that the study is conducted from the particular to the general, from the study of particular facts to generalizations, from causes to results. Deduction is such a way when research is conducted from general facts to particular ones, from results to causes. The inductive method in analysis is used in combination and unity with the deductive method.

Detailing is the selection of constituent parts from the whole. The detailing of certain phenomena is carried out to the extent that is practically necessary to clarify the most significant and most important in the object under study. It depends on the object and purpose of the analysis. This difficult task requires the analyst to have specific knowledge of the essence of economic indicators, as well as the factors and causes that determine their development.

The systematization of elements is carried out on the basis of the study of their relationship, interaction, mutual subordination. This allows you to build an approximate model of the object under study, determine its main components, functions, subordination of system elements, reveal the logical and methodological analysis scheme that corresponds to internal relations studied indicators.

After studying the individual aspects of the economy of the enterprise, their relationship, subordination and dependence, it is necessary to summarize the entire material of the study. Generalization (synthesis) is a very crucial moment in the analysis. When summarizing the results of the analysis, it is necessary to single out typical factors from the entire set of studied factors, separating them from random factors. In addition, it is necessary to be able to identify the main and decisive factors on which performance results depend.

The basis of any science is its subject and method. The subject of financial analysis, that is, what is studied within the framework of this science, is financial resources and their flows. The content and main target of financial analysis is the assessment of the financial condition and the identification of opportunities to improve the efficiency of the functioning of an economic entity with the help of rational financial policy. Achieving this goal is carried out with the help of the method inherent in this science.

The main element of the method of science is its scientific apparatus. At present, it is practically impossible to isolate the techniques and methods of any science as inherent exclusively to it - there is an interpenetration of scientific tools of various sciences. In financial analysis and management, various methods can also be used that were originally developed within the framework of a particular science.

There are various classifications of methods economic analysis. The first level of classification distinguishes formalized and non-formalized methods of analysis. The former are based on the description of analytical procedures at the logical level, and not on strict analytical dependencies. These include methods: expert assessments, scenarios, psychological, morphological, comparisons, building scorecards, building systems of analytical tables, etc. The use of these methods is characterized by a certain subjectivity, since intuition, experience and knowledge of the analyst are of great importance.

The second group includes methods based on fairly strict formalized analytical dependencies. Dozens of these methods are known: they constitute the second level of classification. Let's list some of them.

Classical methods of economic activity analysis and financial analysis: chain substitutions, arithmetic differences, balance sheet, isolation of the isolated influence of factors, percentage numbers, differential, logarithmic, integral, simple and compound interest, discounting.

Traditional methods of economic statistics: averages and relative values, groupings, graphical, index, elementary methods for processing time series.

Mathematical and statistical methods for studying relationships: correlation analysis, regression analysis, analysis of variance, factor analysis, principal component analysis, covariance analysis, object-period method, cluster analysis and other methods.

Econometric methods: matrix methods, harmonic analysis, spectral analysis, theory methods production functions, methods of the theory of input-output balance.

Methods of economic cybernetics, methods of machine simulation, linear programming, non-linear programming, dynamic programming, etc.

Operations research methods and decision theory, graph theory methods, tree method, game theory, queuing theory, network planning and control methods.

2. Integral assessment of the financial stability of the enterprise

Comprehensive diagnostics of the state of the enterprise allows you to evaluate all (or many) aspects of business processes, but it is a rather laborious process, and is usually carried out by third-party consultants. In this regard, the potential frequency of comprehensive diagnostics is very low - less than once a year, and practice shows that it is performed by a limited number of enterprises, mostly in crisis or before the implementation of any major projects (for example, the introduction of information systems management).

The use of complex diagnostics for assessing the reliability will obviously contradict an important economic principle - the principle of profitability, which means that the costs of reliability management should not exceed the financial result obtained from this.

Considering the variety of indicators of financial stability, the difference in the level of their critical assessments and the resulting difficulties in assessing the risk of bankruptcy, many domestic economists recommend making an integral scoring of financial stability.

The essence of this technique lies in the classification of enterprises according to the degree of risk based on the actual level of financial stability indicators and the rating of each indicator, expressed in points. In particular, in the work of L.V. Dontsova and N.A. Nikiforova proposed the following system of indicators and their rating, expressed in points:

Table 1

Integral model of L. V. Dontsova and N. A. Nikiforova

Indicators
				Less than 0.05-0
				Less than 0.05-0
		1,6-1,4 10,5-7,5		Less than 1.0-0
Financial Independence Ratio	0,59-0,54 15-12	0,53-0,43 11,4-7,4	0,42-0,41 6,6-1,8	Less than 0.4-0
				Less than 0.1-0
				Less than 0.5-0
Minimum border value

Strict criteria for assigning enterprises to any class according to the depth of insolvency are defined. The higher the class, the less financially stable the analyzed enterprise.

The assignment of a financial stability class to an enterprise is carried out on the basis of the classification of enterprises according to the degree of risk, based on the actual level of financial stability indicators and the rating of each indicator, expressed in points (the method of "Integral scoring of financial stability"). Further, according to the investment regulations, if the enterprise belongs to the first class (list of classes and indicators are given below), the price per share is calculated at face value, with each next class, 15% is deducted from the initial price.

I - enterprises with a good margin of financial stability, allowing you to be sure of the return of borrowed funds;

II - enterprises that demonstrate some degree of debt risk, but are not yet considered risky;

III - problem enterprises. There is hardly any risk of loss of funds, but the full receipt of interest seems doubtful;

IV - enterprises with a high risk of bankruptcy even after taking measures to financial recovery. Lenders risk losing their funds and interest;

V - enterprises of the highest risk, practically insolvent.

Definitions:

1. Fixed capital (non-current assets) = fixed assets + long-term investments + intangible assets.

2. Working capital (current assets) = inventories + receivables + short-term financial investments + cash.

3. Own capital = Authorized capital + Reserve capital + Additional capital + Accumulation fund + Retained earnings + Target financing and receipts.

4. Capital of the enterprise \u003d Fixed capital (non-current assets) + working capital (current assets).

5. Borrowed capital = leasing + bank loans + loans + accounts payable.

6. Own working capital = Current assets - Short-term financial liabilities.

7. The first group of current assets: Cash Short-term financial investments

8. The second group of current assets: Finished products Goods shipped

Accounts receivable for which payments are expected within 12 months.

must be greater than 0.6

should not exceed 0.7.

The higher the level of the first indicator and the lower the levels of the second and third, the more stable the financial condition of the enterprise.

must be greater than 2.

must be greater than 1.0

should be more than 0.25

table 2

An example of the actual indicators of the financial stability of an enterprise with the definition of belonging to the stability class

Name of indicator	For the beginning of the year			At the end of the year
Name of indicator	actual level	points	Class	actual level	points	Class
Financial Independence Kt:
Kt of current liquidity:
Quick liquidity kit:
Kt of absolute liquidity:
Kt of security with own working capital:
Equity capital back-up ratio:
The class of financial stability to which the enterprise belongs

3. Using an integral score to ensure the repayment of a loan

Interesting in relation to risk assessment various forms ensure the repayment of the loan experience of Germany on the use by banks of a system of three-point evaluation of the effectiveness of different forms of repayment, in accordance with which the maximum limit of lending is set, Table. 3 shows a differentiated assessment (in points) of these forms.

The largest number of points, which means the greatest efficiency, have: mortgage and pledge of deposits. In these cases, there is a relatively high maximum loan amount. At the same time, the complexity of mortgage appraisal lowers the maximum credit level.

Guarantees (guarantees) and pledge of securities received a lower score. The maximum loan amount in the presence of a guarantee with a high creditworthiness of the guarantor can reach 100%. If the creditworthiness of the guarantor is doubtful, the degree of risk increases and therefore the bank may reduce the amount of the loan provided compared to the amount specified in the guarantee agreement or in the letter of guarantee.

Assignment of claims and transfer of ownership have the lowest score due to the increase in the risk of repayment of the loan.

Table 3

Scoring the quality of secondary forms of loan repayment security

Loan repayment form	Usage Prerequisites	Advantages		Maximum loan amount in % to the amount of security

1. Mortgage	Notarial certificate; Entry in the land register	price stability; repeated use; Ease of safety control; Possibility of use by the mortgagor;	High costs for notarization; Difficulty of assessment;
2. Pledge of bank deposits	pledge agreement; The savings book can be deposited with the bank;	Low costs; Highly liquid collateral;	There may be problems related to tax law

3. Guarantee (guarantees)	Written guarantee agreement; Written guarantee	Low costs; Participation of a second person in liability; Quick use	There may be problems when checking the creditworthiness of the guarantor (guarantor)
4. Pledge of securities	pledge agreement; Transfer of securities to the bank for safekeeping	Low costs; Ease of control over price changes (when quoted on the stock exchange); Easy implementation;	There may be a sharp drop in the market price		Shares 50 - 60% fixed interest securities - 70 - 80%
5. Assignment of claims for the supply of goods or services	Assignment agreement; Transfer of a copy of invoices or a list of debtors	Low costs; With an open cession - quick use;	Intensity of control; Problems related to tax law; Special risk of silent cession;
6. Transfer of ownership	Agreement on the transfer of ownership	Low costs; In case of high liquidity - fast sale;	Evaluation problems; Control problems; Use of the appeal to the court;

The presence in the arsenal of banking tools of various forms of ensuring the repayment of a loan suggests the correct choice from an economic point of view of one of them in a particular situation.

To do this, at the time of consideration of a loan application in the banking practice of Germany, they analyze a particular borrower for the risk of a loan. Two indicators are used as risk criteria: the financial condition of the borrower and the quality of the loan security he has.

The financial condition of the borrower in the economic life of Germany is determined by the level of profitability in the share of provision with own funds.

In accordance with these criteria, three groups of enterprises with varying degrees of risk of late loan repayment are distinguished. These are companies with:

Impeccable financial condition, i.е. a solid base of own funds and a high rate of return;

Satisfactory financial condition;

Unsatisfactory financial condition, i.e. low share of own funds and low level of profitability.

According to the availability and quality of security, all enterprises are divided into four risk groups. These are the risks that:

Impeccable security;

Sufficient but unfavorable collateral structure;

Difficult-to-estimate collateral;

Lack of security.

Since both factors act simultaneously for each borrowing enterprise, the following table is compiled for the final conclusion on the degree of credit risk (Table 4.).

Table 4

Classification of enterprises according to the degree of risk of repayment of the loan

As Table. 4., according to the degree of credit risk, five types of enterprises are distinguished. Classification in the first group means minimal risk, since the loan is repaid either due to the impeccable financial condition, or due to the high quality of the security it has. In subsequent groups of enterprises, the degree of risk increases.

From the point of view of the financial condition, three groups of enterprises can be distinguished, differing in the level of profitability and the availability of their own resources. These are companies that have:

Impeccable financial condition, i.е. the share of own funds and the level of profitability are higher than the industry average;

Satisfactory financial condition, i.е. relevant indicators at the level of industry averages;

Unsatisfactory financial condition, i.e. the corresponding figures are below the industry average.

Based on the availability and quality of security, there are four groups of enterprises:

Impeccable security, which should include the predominance in its composition of deposits, easily marketable securities, goods shipped (receivables); currency values; finished products or goods in high demand;

Sufficient but unfavorable provision structure. What does the predominance of liquid funds of the second and third class mean;

Difficult to assess the structure of support, which means the presence of significant amounts of production costs (in agriculture), semi-finished products (work in progress) or products for which demand fluctuates (industries), non-listed securities;

Lack of security.

Since in real life these factors act in combination, it is possible that the influence of positive factors can offset the effect of negative ones; another is possible - the negative influence of one factor will be multiplied by the action of another. Specifically, this interrelation of factors, when considering the problem of the risk of repayment of a loan, can be represented by the following classification of types of enterprises. The enterprises of the first type have the least risk of not repaying the loan. These are enterprises that have an impeccable financial condition, regardless of the availability and quality of collateral, or enterprises that have impeccable collateral, regardless of their financial condition.

The main sources of loan repayment are: sales proceeds and liquid assets, including those serving as loan collateral. Therefore, the risk of non-repayment of the loan is minimal or non-existent if both factors or at least one of them are present. It is in the second case that the negative effect of one factor is leveled due to the positive effect of another factor. With regard to this type of enterprises (except for those with an unsatisfactory financial condition), it is advisable to consider the proceeds from sales as the main form of securing the repayment of a loan, without resorting to legal registration guarantees. For this group of enterprises, the loan repayment mechanism will be based on trust based on the stable financial condition of the borrower. In this case, the bank does not attach importance to either the sufficiency or the quality of the collateral.

Enterprises referred to the second, third and fourth types, in the presence of a certain risk, are generally creditworthy. They have economic prerequisites for repayment of the loan, which must be legally fixed, but the forms of securing the repayment of the loan must be differentiated.

For enterprises of the second type, it is advisable to use a pledge of material assets, taking into account the assessment of the quality of the security.

For enterprises of the third type, it is advisable to use both a pledge of values and a guarantee, or both forms. The choice of form will depend on the real economic situation: assessment of the composition of the collateral and the financial condition of the client.

It is advisable to lend to enterprises of the fourth type either under the guarantee of a financially stable organization, since they have insufficient own sources to repay loans, or by concluding an insurance contract against the risk of not repaying a loan. At the same time, it is logical to increase the interest rate for the use of loans. These enterprises have an increased risk of late loan repayment, so the bank should pay special attention to the analysis of their financial condition and the composition of the collateral.

Finally, the fifth type of enterprises requires special attention and attitude from the bank in connection with a high degree risk. However, this type of enterprises is also heterogeneous. One part of them, with a significant reorganization of production and management, as well as financial support from the bank, can straighten out its reputation. The bank should not leave these enterprises without help, providing it on the terms of a surety (guarantee). Another part of the enterprises can be considered hopeless, it is not recommended to establish credit relations in it.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we draw the following conclusions.

A financially stable enterprise has advantages in attracting investments, obtaining loans, choosing suppliers and consumers; it is more independent of unexpected changes in market conditions, therefore, it has less risk of being insolvent and on the verge of bankruptcy.

Solving the problems of stabilizing the position of an enterprise requires finding sources of financial resources, their rational distribution, and effective use.

The main purpose of the analysis of the financial stability of an enterprise is to accumulate, use and transform information of a financial nature and assess the current and prospective financial condition of the enterprise, the possible and appropriate pace of development of the enterprise from the standpoint of their financial support, identifying available sources of funds and assessing the possibility and expediency of their mobilization, forecasting the position of the enterprise in the capital market. Further prospects for the development of the analysis of the financial stability of an enterprise are associated with the development of new analytical coefficients, as well as with the expansion of the information base of the analysis.

Bibliography:

1. Abryutina M.S., Grachev A.V. Analysis of the financial and economic activities of the enterprise: Educational and practical guide.-3rd edition, revised and supplemented. - M.: Business and service, 2003.-272p.

2. Balabanov I.T., red. Banks and banking. - St. Petersburg: Peter, 2005. - 256 p.

3. Vyatkin V.N., Vyatkin I.V., Gamza V.A. etc. Risk management. - M.: Publishing house Dashkov and K, 2003.- 493 p.

4. Dontsova L.V., Nikiforova N.A. Analysis of financial statements (fragment of the book) //Financial management. - 2003. - No. 1. - p. 122.

5. Efimova O.P. The financial analysis. - 4th edition, revised. and additional - M.: Accounting, 2004. -528s.

6. Kovalev V.V., Volkova O.N. Analysis of the economic activity of the enterprise: Textbook. - M.: TK Velby, Iz-vo Prospekt, 2004. - 424 p.

7. Lavrushin O.I. Banking: a modern credit system. - M.: KnoRus, 2005. - 272 p.

8. Rusanov Yu.Yu. Theory and practice of risk management of credit organizations in Russia. - M.: Economist, 2004.

9. Savitskaya G.V. Business Analysis: Textbook. - 3rd ed.; revised add. - M.: INFRA-M, 2004.- 425 p.

10. Samsonova N.F. Financial management: Textbook for universities - 2nd edition, revised. and additional - M.: UNITY - DANA, 2004

11. Enterprise Economics: Textbook for universities / ed. prof. V.L. Gorfinkel, prof. Shvander V.A. - 3rd ed., revised. and additional - M.: UNITI-DANA, 2003.

Samsonova N.F. Financial management: Textbook for universities - 2nd edition, revised. and additional - M.: UNITY - DANA, 2004. - S. 81

Enterprise Economics: Textbook for universities / ed. prof. V.L. Gorfinkel, prof. Shvander V.A. - 3rd ed., revised. and additional - M.: UNITI-DANA, 2003. - S. 57

Abryutina M.S., Grachev A.V. Analysis of the financial and economic activities of the enterprise: Educational and practical guide.-3rd edition, revised and supplemented. - M.: Business and service, 2003.- S. 67

Dontsova L.V., Nikiforova N.A. Analysis of financial statements (fragment of the book) //Financial management. - 2003. - No. 1. - p. 122.

Vyatkin V.N., Vyatkin I.V., Gamza V.A. etc. Risk management. - M.: Publishing house Dashkov and K, 2003.- S. 83

Lavrushin O.I. Banking: a modern credit system. - M.: KnoRus, 2005. - S. 69

Integral assessment of the financial and economic state of the enterprise. Features of the integral assessment of the financial condition of an industrial enterprise in modern economic conditions Integral scoring of financial stability

Diagnostics of the probability of bankruptcy

annotation scientific article on economics and business, author of scientific work - Aliev A.A., Solovieva M.G., Kachalina A.D.

Related Topics scientific papers on economics and business, the author of scientific work - Aliev A.A., Solovieva M.G., Kachalina A.D.

Integral Estimation of the Company""s Financial Condition

The text of the scientific work on the topic "Integral assessment of the financial condition of the enterprise"

Introduction

1. Theoretical foundations for analyzing the financial stability of an enterprise

1.1 The concept of financial stability of the enterprise

1.2 Methods for analyzing the financial stability of an enterprise

2. Integral assessment of the financial stability of the enterprise

3. Using an integral score to ensure the repayment of a loan

Conclusion

Bibliography: